Who thinks Obama's birth certificate is real?

Thats the thing, its like an insult. I would drag my feet too..

He got the job and everyone is pissed, I get that. I get that people dont want to listen to a black democrat cause the republicans obviously know better, thats why they won the election right? Oh wait, they didnt. Now, why is that? Why all the sudden, 3 years into this, are people trying to make a stink?

Its a waste of media coverage but if you're trollin stories like this anyways I think the news network might need retooling.. maybe a meeting is in order.

To get the job there are these things called prerequisites and he obviously filled all those prerequisites... Its an insult to keep saying "you have to show your birth certificate" over and over cause someone says they have to, someone who isnt even in government. If your boss said that, after you worked there for 3 years and passed your backround check. The government says you're you, your license says you're you. The little thing on the end of your desk that says Mr. ____ (aka you) says your you.. Every morning you wake up and you're still you, why would you be asked to prove it like once a month. Even after he has proven it byt being in the position in the first place.... I think thats evidence enough.

I dont see how this is still an issue. Seriously, who told you guys who dont believe that its not real, its not real? Who told you its not real????? How did this thought enter your mind?

 
The fact that he IS the president is proof. I did not launch my own investigation, im not the one making the claim that its fake. I agree with the consensus. When someone says there is a god one has to prove it, you're the one making the claim. Even if the claim is negative, like the president of the USA's birth certificate is fake. You're the one making the claim, the burden of proof of your claim is on you.

I agree with the consensus, I'm not making any claims contrary to the facts. That means I dont need to launch an investigation because I agree.

Thats like literally the best background check you can get... There was an investigation launched when he filled out the forms to apply for the job. The FACT is him being in the position means that there was an investigation, paid for by you the tax payer.

 
Thats the thing, its like an insult. I would drag my feet too..
He got the job and everyone is pissed, I get that. I get that people dont want to listen to a black democrat cause the republicans obviously know better, thats why they won the election right? Oh wait, they didnt. Now, why is that? Why all the sudden, 3 years into this, are people trying to make a stink?

Its a waste of media coverage but if you're trollin stories like this anyways I think the news network might need retooling.. maybe a meeting is in order.

To get the job there are these things called prerequisites and he obviously filled all those prerequisites... Its an insult to keep saying "you have to show your birth certificate" over and over cause someone says they have to, someone who isnt even in government. If your boss said that, after you worked there for 3 years and passed your backround check. The government says you're you, your license says you're you. The little thing on the end of your desk that says Mr. ____ (aka you) says your you.. Every morning you wake up and you're still you, why would you be asked to prove it like once a month. Even after he has proven it byt being in the position in the first place.... I think thats evidence enough.

I dont see how this is still an issue. Seriously, who told you guys who dont believe that its not real, its not real? Who told you its not real????? How did this thought enter your mind?
You've answered your own question, the media put it in their heads. And its not a new topic 3 years in, this came up during the election and is still going on today.

 
The fact that he IS the president is proof. I did not launch my own investigation, im not the one making the claim that its fake. I agree with the consensus. When someone says there is a god one has to prove it, you're the one making the claim. Even if the claim is negative, like the president of the USA's birth certificate is fake. You're the one making the claim, the burden of proof of your claim is on you.
I agree with the consensus, I'm not making any claims contrary to the facts. That means I dont need to launch an investigation because I agree.

Thats like literally the best background check you can get... There was an investigation launched when he filled out the forms to apply for the job. The FACT is him being in the position means that there was an investigation, paid for by you the tax payer.
They claim a conspiracy. You say there is no conspiracy because they tell you there isn't. Again if we use your rule of needing to launch your own investigation to know the truth, who here can speak?

 
Buck, I don't think you realize how much you and I are alike. I'm pretty sure I have agreed with every single thing in this thread that you poasted and related it to myself.
Thats cool.

On a side note, politics are about doing whats in the best interest for the company or person that paid for you to be there. Even if a politician is doing whats right, he/she will back off if it means not getting re elected or losing votes in the next election. If youre a dem you have to do what all the dems decide on and if your a rep you pretty much have to do what all the reps say or the ban hammer comes down. you step outside of those parties and you will be pooped on and squashed. Ron Paul is full of **** too. dont even come in here with your ron paul garbage. Point is, the politicians are supposed to be elected to do what is in the best interest of the people and thats just about the last thing that they do. even if they say theyre doing it, its only when its in their best interest. Our country is a dump and it doesnt matter who is president. I would look for the reserve currency to change in the next few years, gas to go way up overnight, and for inflation to skyrocket followed by the economical demise of the country and/or some industrial revolution backed by renewable energy.

 
Buck, I don't think you realize how much you and I are alike. I'm pretty sure I have agreed with every single thing in this thread that you poasted and related it to myself.
Idk, man, don't know why that is. I just tell it like I feel it, whether it's right or wrong in whoever's eyes. It is what it is, and what it is, needs to change. And not Obama change, not -insert name here- change, but change for the benefit and survival of America.

I just have to ask, where is the pride in being American?

 
The burden of proof is on those making the claim....! I'm NOT making a claim contrary to the FACT that he is a us citizen. I KNOW for a fact that the commander and chief of the united states military is a us citizen. You cant become a commander or a cheif let alone commander and cheif without meeting those requirements. Otherwise when the investigation was launched to prove he is who he is would have come up with evidence contrary to the facts he provided on his application.

AGAIN, the burden of proof is on those making the claim. To agree with a FACT requires no investigation, even though there has been several on the topic. Since I'm not making the claim contrary to a FACT I dont need to launch an investigation. Do you understand?? There is EMPIRICAL evidence to support his claim that he is an american citizen. There is no evidence to support any claims that he is not an american citizen, the burden of proof is on those making the claim. He has already proven multiple times hes an american citizen, its a fact.

Now if anyones has empirical evidence that he is not an american citizen I dare you to show it... Infact I'll bet someone would easily pay over a million dollars for empirical evidence to support the claim that he is not an american citizen.

If I said "evolution is fake." that claim is contrary to the FACT that the process of evolution is infact, a fact. I would have to provide evidence contrary to the fact and disprove evolution THEN my competing theory would go under peer review. If it were proven to be fact it would replace the current theory of evolution. Since I'm not making ANY claims of the sort I dont need to launch an investigation, I agree with the facts.

If I said "ham cures cancer" I would have to come up with evidence to support my claim that ham can cure cancer.

If I was to say "fifty cent AKA curtis jackson is a caucasian female. " I would have to come up with empirical evidence to support my claim.

To simply agree with the fact that he is infact a black male does not require an investigation. I just agreed with it and thats it, its obvious that he is infact a black male. Why would I need to launch an investigation into something so obvious and was proven on the day he was born.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Buck

5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
Thread starter
Buck
Joined
Location
Inside of a pyramid
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
421
Views
4,263
Last reply date
Last reply from
SACRAMANIAC916
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top