The burden of proof is on those making the claim....! I'm NOT making a claim contrary to the FACT that he is a us citizen. I KNOW for a fact that the commander and chief of the united states military is a us citizen. You cant become a commander or a cheif let alone commander and cheif without meeting those requirements. Otherwise when the investigation was launched to prove he is who he is would have come up with evidence contrary to the facts he provided on his application.
AGAIN, the burden of proof is on those making the claim. To agree with a FACT requires no investigation, even though there has been several on the topic. Since I'm not making the claim contrary to a FACT I dont need to launch an investigation. Do you understand?? There is EMPIRICAL evidence to support his claim that he is an american citizen. There is no evidence to support any claims that he is not an american citizen, the burden of proof is on those making the claim. He has already proven multiple times hes an american citizen, its a fact.
Now if anyones has empirical evidence that he is not an american citizen I dare you to show it... Infact I'll bet someone would easily pay over a million dollars for empirical evidence to support the claim that he is not an american citizen.
If I said "evolution is fake." that claim is contrary to the FACT that the process of evolution is infact, a fact. I would have to provide evidence contrary to the fact and disprove evolution THEN my competing theory would go under peer review. If it were proven to be fact it would replace the current theory of evolution. Since I'm not making ANY claims of the sort I dont need to launch an investigation, I agree with the facts.
If I said "ham cures cancer" I would have to come up with evidence to support my claim that ham can cure cancer.
If I was to say "fifty cent AKA curtis jackson is a caucasian female. " I would have to come up with empirical evidence to support my claim.
To simply agree with the fact that he is infact a black male does not require an investigation. I just agreed with it and thats it, its obvious that he is infact a black male. Why would I need to launch an investigation into something so obvious and was proven on the day he was born.