Pretty much all of that was inaccurate.This is only assumptions, but I have read on both of these subs, and they have been described as good SQL subs. Anyway, both subs have a low 'BL' which is electromagnetic force, and assuming while the 'BL' is low, this means the sub can move quicker. With a sub that can move quicker, it can recreate/reproduce the acoustic notes quicker, and with better accuracy. DD is known for their impressive 'SPL' subwoofers, and have always made woofers that get LOUD, so I was assuming even though the 9100 series is actually an SQ woofer, it will still get quite loud, 'cause face it, it's a DD.
a tc boner... i'd go either FI q or W6 and they don't make W6v1's anymore so the V2 isn't technically another version of the w6, IT is the new version of the w6, JL doesn't understand the concept of versionsWhat others think? I see about equal percentage of W6 and Fi Q voted in another forum but more TC-2000 here...Interesting...I'd like to know why do you guys choose your choice...
I think that you don't understand the concept of versions. The W6v2 would be the second sub to have the W6 series designation. That would make it a Version 2. Just because v1 isn't being produced any longer, doesn't mean that v2 isn't v2. What about the W3? Up to v3. W1? Up to v2 as well. They have to differentiate them somehow. Version numbers makes it easy. Much easier than trying to figure out which version of a Kicker sub you're dealing with.they don't make W6v1's anymore so the V2 isn't technically another version of the w6, IT is the new version of the w6, JL doesn't understand the concept of versions