These vaccine stories are generally not accepted by the scientific community. I didn't read every line of that site, but I can make the objections to it that I'm quite sure apply.
This theory is contradicted by an analysis of genetic mutation in primate lentivirus strains that estimates the origin of the HIV-1 strain to be around 1930, with 95% certainty of it lying between 1910 and 1950.
The "Hunter theory" that I alluded to earlier is widely considered the most probable situation in which HIV was passed to humans. Mind you, we don't know definitively, so it could be anything. I'm just playing the odds. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifIn February 2000 one of the original developers of the polio vaccine, the Philadelphia based Wistar Institute, found a vial of the original vaccine used in the vaccination program. It was analyzed in April 2001, and no traces of either HIV-1 or SIV were found in the sample. A second analysis showed that only macaque monkey kidney cells, which cannot be infected with SIV or HIV, were used to produce the vaccine.
Yea I found arguments against it on other sites.These vaccine stories are generally not accepted by the scientific community. I didn't read every line of that site, but I can make the objections to it that I'm quite sure apply.
The "Hunter theory" that I alluded to earlier is widely considered the most probable situation in which HIV was passed to humans. Mind you, we don't know definitively, so it could be anything. I'm just playing the odds. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
The CIA.
i second that.
I think to say "very little or none" is a bit close minded at best. even if you dont believe in it it is still considered evidence... http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=34&contentid=4429Do you guys really think that?
What evidence is there to substantiate this? Very little or none?