What The ****?

[UndercoverPunk 5,000+ posts]

never been a problem with linking to an on site ad

Thank god... hitler agrees.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif

I wonder if that'll get a rise...

 

[wilzyx 5,000+ posts]

Noah doesn't run/own/get money from sloganizer? Isn't that the issue?

ya, i think mike is just retarted, yes, retarted with a "t"

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Believe you completely missed Noah's point...

No shit.

It's not that hard to comprehend, unless you are utterly DENSE.

He's ALLOWED the keep the "TCAB" sticker image... but the URL ONLY... JUST THE URL... needs to be removed. NOT THE ENTIRE IMAGE...

Get it?

nG

 

[Prowler573 5,000+ posts]

well i honestly dont think saying you can not have any text in your sig image is gonna happen.

This isn't at all what I am asking to happen, either.

i see where your coming from, but if we say he cant have that image, all these people w/ a sloganizer.net image cant have theirs either, and several people that use their ssa.com sig image on here cant use it, and any that have any type of url visible. just too many people to deal with, the thing is his sig image doesnt say anywhere that he makes stuff for a monetary gain.

The random lunacy resulting from the Sloganizer.net signature additions are nothing more than that ~ random lunacy. I understand that Mark's signature image doesn't specifically state that the website is intended for his own personal financial advancement. It doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to work it out, though.

Assuming my memory hasn't completely left me the most recent link in Dave's sig didn't make any specific mention of monetary gain either until you followed the link (exactly what you would find upon plugging http://www.TheCarAudioBox.com into your browser's navigation bar) so I still see it as an incredibly flagrant double-standard.

Perhaps I should simply remove myself from this discussion altogether outside of watching to see what becomes of it as my particular thought processes and chains of logic apparently do not quite meld with that of the members of the moderation team and I do not wish to get crossways with you or any of the others. Prowler's world is more than a bit black and white with little room left for gray. So - I'll just sit back and watch and good luck finding a mutually agreeable conclusion for all parties concerned.

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

Believe you completely missed Noah's point...

i understand his point, but im looking at it from both sides. i understand that we know he makes money off the site, but lets assume for a min, we didnt know that. would we still ask him to remove the url form his sig image then? no we wouldnt. so if u look at it from the most basic standpoint there is nothing that violates the tos in his sig. not sure how we went from lemans to this but ohh well.

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

?

The only thing that matters is what actually is. I'm surprised you're having a hard time with this one...considering it's so clearly spelled out in the TOS.

 

[Prowler573 5,000+ posts]

?
The only thing that matters is what actually is. I'm surprised you're having a hard time with this one...considering it's so clearly spelled out in the TOS.

Is this directed at me or Mike, Jim?

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

i understand his point, but im looking at it from both sides. i understand that we know he makes money off the site, but lets assume for a min, we didnt know that. would we still ask him to remove the url form his sig image then? no we wouldnt. so if u look at it from the most basic standpoint there is nothing that violates the tos in his sig. not sure how we went from lemans to this but ohh well.

VISIT THE FUKKING SITE!!!!!

I'll do it for EVERY PERSON I ask to remove URL's from signatures.

If I find that the URL in their signature is used for monetary gain, I will ask them to remove it. Simple as that...

PLAIN AND FUKKING SIMPLE...

Get it? Got it? Good.

A perfectly SIMPLE solution, that is in NO WAY a double standard.

Also, all members feel free to PM questionable URL's or signatures to a member of the moderation team... or just come straight to me. I'll take care of things without any hesitation or double standards.

DONE.

nG

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

i give up. ban him or do whatever you want noah, u always do anyways

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

Is this directed at me or Mike, Jim?

Mike.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

i give up. ban him or do whatever you want noah, u always do anyways

It's CLEARLY not that hard to comprehend. So I don't understand what the confusion is.

I sent him a PM asking him to remove the URL only from the image... and if he does not comply after 48hours AND another PM... I will address the topic of a ban in the backroom...

nG

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

Thank god... hitler agrees.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif

I wonder if that'll get a rise...

would take more than that

 

[boomanchu]

Sucks for lemons

I need some LMAOnade

 

[UndercoverPunk 5,000+ posts]

would take more than that

I'll try harder next time... actually... I'll most likely forget.

 

[PV Sound]

Please don't ban this account yet. No one gave me notice of me doing anything whatsoever, and I sent a PM to the admin to see. If someone would please PM me the reason for the ban, I'd be more than happy to comply. However, there was no mention of me doing anything wrong ESPECIALLY since squeak himself approved my signature. So someone get at me and don't ban this name since I need answers without people being hasty. I especially cannot see anything racially motivated that I've EVER done actually. Oh well, someone inform me through PM since the admin won't be on for another few days and I'm in a trade in the classifieds. Thanks.

-Dave