What The ****?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prowler Jntar did not lie yet...
Like I said - if I am mistaken then I retract my entire post....but!
He just said he had been warned countless times. Never said there was a discussion thread in the mod back room.
I certainly got that impression from the very first sentence in the post that began with:

If he breaks the TOS then a thread is made in the backroom to vote on
 
Well...

No I didnt lie...there was no thread. I will however refrain from commenting on Noah's post for reasons that were discused a while ago in the backroom.

I feel that the ban might have been a bit much, but I back the decision makers decision. He was breaking rules and had been warned by me and others in the past.

 
I would hope the mods come to a unanimous conclusion about banning.
From what I gather out of Noah's post I am now under the assumption that this simply isn't the case.

Don't get me wrong ~ I'm not trying to bag on Justin....I've got no beef with him at all. But yet again it smacks glaringly of favoritism to me. "X" person is guilty of something that we're gonna stay on his case about. It doesn't get corrected after repeated discussions so it results in a ban. But, if "Y" person does the very same thing then no sanctions are applied to them?

Le sigh.

It just adds to the list of reasons why I would not care to be a part of the moderation team to save my life. Like anything else that a human being or beings are placed in charge of, there is too much room for potential error.

Every post Mark has on the forum has the URL to his business website contained in the signature. No, it isn't a live, clickable link, but the address is there plain as day. How in the world isn't that advertising whereas what Dave had going somehow crosses the line?

I don't mean to specifically call out Mark, either. I haven't spent any $$$ with him so there's no beef between he and I either ~ he just unfortunately happens to be a convenient example of what I see as a truly detestable double-standard.

 
From what I gather out of Noah's post I am now under the assumption that this simply isn't the case.
Don't get me wrong ~ I'm not trying to bag on Justin....I've got no beef with him at all. But yet again it smacks glaringly of favoritism to me. "X" person is guilty of something that we're gonna stay on his case about. It doesn't get corrected after repeated discussions so it results in a ban. But, if "Y" person does the very same thing then no sanctions are applied to them?

Le sigh.

It just adds to the list of reasons why I would not care to be a part of the moderation team to save my life. Like anything else that a human being or beings are placed in charge of, there is too much room for potential error.

Every post Mark has on the forum has the URL to his business website contained in the signature. No, it isn't a live, clickable link, but the address is there plain as day. How in the world isn't that advertising whereas what Dave had going somehow crosses the line?

I don't mean to specifically call out Mark, either. I haven't spent any $$$ with him so there's no beef between he and I either ~ he just unfortunately happens to be a convenient example of what I see as a truly detestable double-standard.
i just looked at his sig, and it doesnt violate the tos in any way, no advertising either there is a link to his site as an image, but if we start limiting what you can have as an image in your sig alot of people are gonna start crying, and many members will have to remove theirs

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Thread starter
chimichonga
Joined
Location
you wanna know?
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
178
Views
3,036
Last reply date
Last reply from
JimJ
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top