What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not how it works, big guy from a big metro.

What you’re doing is like using a word to define itself. You can’t say the definition of red is “red in color”.

You can’t say someone’s words are lies, and then repeat the words as proof of your claim.

And don’t be like Thxone, who uses “because I said so” as his proof of a claim. That’s even worse.
You claimed Trump said:

Screenshot_20230810_153235_Brave.jpg

You failed to prove that statement...

So either you lied or you're happy to propagate a false narrative...which is it?
 
So are we playing the "Jan 6th didn't happen game" or the "lets parse Jimi's words" or the "let's pretend we can't distinguish between figurative and literal or that it even matters?"

That's just a still frame image of guys pointing guns at a blocked door.

Perhaps we could teach RobGMN how to distinguish between figurative and literal. Man these conversations would hurt a whole lot less if he learned.
 
Last edited:
So are we playing the "Jan 6th didn't happen game" or the "lets parse Jimi's words" or the "let's pretend we can't distinguish between figurative and literal or that it even matters?"

That’s a broken window, and we don’t know who broke that window. That’s my point is we don’t know if non-MAGA people were doing damage inside of the Capitol, too, and who did what to what extent. Why did Capitol police allow them inside by opening the doors?
 
Seems to me it's like that because YOU say so Rob. This is literally just your point of view and the way YOU feel about it.

Why is it any time someone calls you out on something you find some spin out of it, use some technicality to not be wrong in your mind, never admit you made the mistake or that you were wrong?

You made the statement did you not? The conversation was about Trump was it not? You linked to his speech did you not? You wanted us to find the statement in the speech did you not? You then spun your way out of it didn't you? Apparently Trump made the statement because you said so but you refuse to show proof, refuse to provide the facts. Apparently that is all ok, you're allowed to be a liar and a hypocrite because you voted for the other guy.

Your little nerves and bones example is played out. Your claim that I provided no proof is an outright lie. Your refusal of facts and proof does not mean they were not provided. You read a few things with your limited knowledge of biology and claim what you read is the be all end all of the discussion based on your interpretation and lack of understanding of what you read. Your opinions on what you read is irrelevant and was argued by you out of ignorance Mr. Secretary man.
Proof positive right here.
You say the bones/nerves thing is “played out” and then claim you provided proof of your claim that bones don’t have nerves in them.
A claim that is completely and utterly incorrect.
Yet you’ll say I’m wrong because of my “limited knowledge of biology” (when the bone/nerve discussion is really about anatomy, which was not your focus of study).
And then you’ll go round and round and round trying to make your opinion a fact through repetition, when you simply cannot.

And so it goes.
 
That’s a broken window, and we don’t know who broke that window. That’s my point is we don’t know if non-MAGA people were doing damage inside of the Capitol, too, and who did what to what extent. Why did Capitol police allow them inside by opening the doors?
LOL - yeah the antifa clad Capital Police are the ones that broke the window, not the actual MAGA rioters. And of course we don't know who did damage inside the Capitol despite all the videos (taken by MAGA people), all the guilty verdicts, all the social media posts (again by MAGA people).

Have you watched the video of the Capitol police letting the protestors in? What did they tell the protestors? Is there any logical reason they might have let them in based on the audio and video? Or is it all just part of the larger conspiracy?
 
Proof positive right here.
You say the bones/nerves thing is “played out” and then claim you provided proof of your claim that bones don’t have nerves in them.
A claim that is completely and utterly incorrect.
Yet you’ll say I’m wrong because of my “limited knowledge of biology” (when the bone/nerve discussion is really about anatomy, which was not your focus of study).
And then you’ll go round and round and round trying to make your opinion a fact through repetition, when you simply cannot.

And so it goes.
Incorrect Rob, like normal.
 
That's just a still frame image of guys pointing guns at a blocked door.

Perhaps we could teach RobGMN how to distinguish between figurative and literal. Man these conversations would hurt a whole lot less if he learned.
Do you mean like trying to say “in” doesn’t mean “in” when all of medical science says there are nerves “in” bone and that bones are innervated?

Are they speaking figuratively or literally?
 
Do you mean like trying to say “in” doesn’t mean “in” when all of medical science says there are nerves “in” bone and that bones are innervated?

Are they speaking figuratively or literally?
One last time for Rob the Reeeeeetard.

The periosteum is the covering around bone. This is where the nerves are. Not inside the hard structure that is bone.
 
Do you mean like trying to say “in” doesn’t mean “in” when all of medical science says there are nerves “in” bone and that bones are innervated?

Are they speaking figuratively or literally?
How about you back up your claim before calling anyone else out...
 
That’s a broken window, and we don’t know who broke that window. That’s my point is we don’t know if non-MAGA people were doing damage inside of the Capitol, too, and who did what to what extent. Why did Capitol police allow them inside by opening the doors?
Well, we know who broke this one and climbed through:


And we know who was ramming this door, trying to forcefully enter a locked US Capitol building:

Which bullshit are you going to respond with to claim it’s not real or not Trump supporters? Will it be Antifa? Democrat operatives? Soros plants? AI generated CGI?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
805,214
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top