What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s no telling what all long term illnesses will pop up from the experimental covid shots given to the masses. I think there’s a lot of symptoms people have that haven’t been linked to the covid vaccines, yet:

“Another apparent complication, a debilitating suite of symptoms that resembles Long Covid, has been more elusive, its link to vaccination unclear and its diagnostic features ill-defined. But in recent months, what some call Long Vax has gained wider acceptance among doctors and scientists, and some are now working to better understand and treat its symptoms.”

AN IMMUNE OVERREACTION to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which COVID-19 vaccines use to induce protective antibodies, is one possible cause of these symptoms.”

Another smoking gun: “its link to vaccination unclear and its diagnostic features ill-defined”

But it’s definitely the vax.
 
Hawaii - that's just the price to live in paradise.
HaHaHaHahAahahaha thats all the Stockholm liberals say. I’ve watch this state collapse in the past 25yrs. The greed and mismanagement is crazy. We have a 25 miles sky rail system that’s currently being built (12yrs) starting cost $2.9 billion currently over $15 billion and the current phase is the most expensive and there are no restrooms. We the tax payers drowning with all theses new taxes. The politicians so flagrant because they know blue voters bloods and like name recognition. I can keep going on…..
 
Last edited:
HaHaHaHahAahahaha thats all the Stockholm liberals say. I’ve watch this state collapse in the past 25yrs. The greed and mismanagement is crazy. We have a 25 miles sky rail system that’s currently being built (12yrs) starting cost $2.9 billion currently over $15 billion and the current phase is the most expensive and there are no restrooms. We the tax payers drowning with all theses new taxes. The politicians so flagrant because they know blue voters bloods and like name recognition. I can keep going on…..
Where are the liberals coming from? We have the same thing here in Colorado, liberals from California moved here and there wasn't a spending bill they wouldn't support.
 
Why would they be fiscally responsible, the people that fund their campaigns don't want fiscal responsibility and since they have a small tax burden, they don't have face the repercussions of fiscal irresponsibly.
It's not just the donors...the overall caliber of politician we have in office won't take the hard stand and say "we can't afford that"...they'd rather run for reelection on the "I voted to spend on that" platform...
 
Last edited:
It's not just the donors...the overall caliber of politician we have in office won't take the hard stand and say "we can't afford that"...they'd rather run for reelection on the "I voted to spend on that" platform...
Defense spending could certainly be scaled back. The Covid relief spending was a boondoggle that we be paying for for years. I don't think it's so much that they shouldn't spend, but there should be oversight of how the money is spent.
 
Last edited:
Defense spending could certainly be scaled back. The Covid relief spending was a boondoggle that we be paying for for years. I don't it so much that they shouldn't spend, but there should be oversight of how the money is spent.
There's tons of waste in defense spending...and that's without getting into how much we spend on other nations defense...

I would vote for an outright communist or a burnt out dopefiend if they guaranteed an audit of fed spending 🤣
 
There's tons of waste in defense spending...and that's without getting into how much we spend on other nations defense...

I would vote for an outright communist or a burnt out dopefiend if they guaranteed an audit of fed spending 🤣
The problem is they talk about accountability, but they never follow thru, even the dopefiends.
 
““I listened to RFK on several podcasts and a town hall and thought he raised important issues about vaccines and other issues that were worth learning more about,” said Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square Capital. “I don’t feel like we’ve fully answered questions about the safety of all vaccines, particularly more recently approved vaccines, and our approach to determining their safety and efficacy.”“

 
Last edited:
““I listened to RFK on several podcasts and a town hall and thought he raised important issues about vaccines and other issues that were worth learning more about,” said Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square Capital. “I don’t feel like we’ve fully answered questions about the safety of all vaccines, particularly more recently approved vaccines, and our approach to determining their safety and efficacy.”“

I'm guessing Pershing was long Pfizer in 2020/21 and now he's short Pfizer.
 

The FDA wants to limit your health care options. Remember the government cares...

Summary of the Issue


The current DEA waiver of the in-person exam requirement falls under exception #4 of the Ryan Haight Act, i.e., the Public Health Emergency (PHE). It will expire when the COVID-19 PHE ends May 11, 2023.

The DEA’s proposal to update the Ryan Haight Act would drastically impair interstate telemedicine prescribing of non-narcotic Schedule III, IV, and V medications, creating unnecessary burdens on both patients and physicians resulting in limited access to treatment and increased risk of patient harm.

  • The DEA’s newly proposed rules would require an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician to prescribe controlled non-narcotic medications in Schedule III, IV, and V.
  • If the telemedicine provider chooses to have the patient examined by another physician located in the same State as the patient, the DEA would also require examining physicians as well as prescribing physicians to have a DEA registration and that each physician maintain all records for the patient, even after a referral has been made.
  • According to the new rules, recording the date of examination is no longer adequate record-keeping, as the DEA wants each physician to record the precise time of the visit.
  • There would also be a requirement that the doctors coordinate the simultaneous use of two-way audio-communication during one of the patient’s visits.
  • Most troubling is that without an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician, only a 30-day supply of medication may be prescribed.
 

The FDA wants to limit your health care options. Remember the government cares...

Summary of the Issue


The current DEA waiver of the in-person exam requirement falls under exception #4 of the Ryan Haight Act, i.e., the Public Health Emergency (PHE). It will expire when the COVID-19 PHE ends May 11, 2023.

The DEA’s proposal to update the Ryan Haight Act would drastically impair interstate telemedicine prescribing of non-narcotic Schedule III, IV, and V medications, creating unnecessary burdens on both patients and physicians resulting in limited access to treatment and increased risk of patient harm.

  • The DEA’s newly proposed rules would require an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician to prescribe controlled non-narcotic medications in Schedule III, IV, and V.
  • If the telemedicine provider chooses to have the patient examined by another physician located in the same State as the patient, the DEA would also require examining physicians as well as prescribing physicians to have a DEA registration and that each physician maintain all records for the patient, even after a referral has been made.
  • According to the new rules, recording the date of examination is no longer adequate record-keeping, as the DEA wants each physician to record the precise time of the visit.
  • There would also be a requirement that the doctors coordinate the simultaneous use of two-way audio-communication during one of the patient’s visits.
  • Most troubling is that without an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician, only a 30-day supply of medication may be prescribed.
Lol- they’re concentrated on this, meanwhile people are dying of fentanyl overdoses left and right. These alphabet agencies gotta go. What a joke. We got a bunch of geniuses working at the DEA. Let’s attack doctors and patients! The cartels are ok, though.
 
Last edited:

The FDA wants to limit your health care options. Remember the government cares...

Summary of the Issue


The current DEA waiver of the in-person exam requirement falls under exception #4 of the Ryan Haight Act, i.e., the Public Health Emergency (PHE). It will expire when the COVID-19 PHE ends May 11, 2023.

The DEA’s proposal to update the Ryan Haight Act would drastically impair interstate telemedicine prescribing of non-narcotic Schedule III, IV, and V medications, creating unnecessary burdens on both patients and physicians resulting in limited access to treatment and increased risk of patient harm.

  • The DEA’s newly proposed rules would require an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician to prescribe controlled non-narcotic medications in Schedule III, IV, and V.
  • If the telemedicine provider chooses to have the patient examined by another physician located in the same State as the patient, the DEA would also require examining physicians as well as prescribing physicians to have a DEA registration and that each physician maintain all records for the patient, even after a referral has been made.
  • According to the new rules, recording the date of examination is no longer adequate record-keeping, as the DEA wants each physician to record the precise time of the visit.
  • There would also be a requirement that the doctors coordinate the simultaneous use of two-way audio-communication during one of the patient’s visits.
  • Most troubling is that without an in-person evaluation by the prescribing physician, only a 30-day supply of medication may be prescribed.
Gotta do everything they can to prevent the cost of Healthcare going down...
 
““I listened to RFK on several podcasts and a town hall and thought he raised important issues about vaccines and other issues that were worth learning more about,” said Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square Capital. “I don’t feel like we’ve fully answered questions about the safety of all vaccines, particularly more recently approved vaccines, and our approach to determining their safety and efficacy.”“

IMG_0356.jpeg

So RFK is spewing BS and Ackerman backs him up.
Must mean the BS is truth. 🙄
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
804,468
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top