What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Except that it's not. Those aren't made up numbers. Those are actual numbers from the same events. The difference, one is the mans numbers, the other, the woman's. These are the norm. These are typical. For a woman to be near the physical strength of a man she will have to be 20-40% larger than the male she is next to.

Right. So no biological female should ever play on a male team and no biological male should ever play on a female team, no matter their capabilities.

Females and males (by birth genitalia) should not ever compete in any arena, regardless of capability.

Genitalia is what makes the person. Not their capacity to compete equally.

Right?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Right. So no biological female should ever play on a male team and no biological male should ever play on a female team, no matter their capabilities.

Females and males (by birth genitalia) should not ever compete in any arena, regardless of capability.

Right?

What's your goal here Rob?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

What's your goal here Rob?

To be "right" like always...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

To be "right" like always...

He knows he's wrong. He knows it's not a fair match having men of any kind competing against women. Yet he will argue some obscure detail to the end.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He knows he's wrong. He knows it's not a fair match having men of any kind competing against women. Yet he will argue some obscure detail to the end.

I bet Rousey would drop you like a bad habit in under 20 seconds.
I’ll bet the worst player on the ENBA could outplay you with one hand behind their back.
Any female boxer would smoke you before the first round is over.

Stop thinking your prick makes you superior.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What's your goal here Rob?

Answer my question. Is my statement right or is it wrong?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He knows he's wrong. He knows it's not a fair match having men of any kind competing against women. Yet he will argue some obscure detail to the end.

Go work on proving there are no nerves in bone, before you get into more complicated concepts.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Right. So no biological female should ever play on a male team and no biological male should ever play on a female team, no matter their capabilities.

Females and males (by birth genitalia) should not ever compete in any arena, regardless of capability.

Genitalia is what makes the person. Not their capacity to compete equally.

Right?

It's good for a lark - see Martina Navratilova vs Jimmy Connors. It's not just the capacity to compete. We've already had issues with women changing with "non-women" in the women's locker room. As I've said, "they" are welcome set up their own non-gender leagues. It's not like coed sports are something new, we've just never had sanctioned, professional, etc coed sports.

Why is the left so anxious to ensure that "non-men" get the opportunity to compete against women in athletics? Luckily my girl hasn't had to compete against boys in track yet, but I live in the Denver Metro area, so her opportunity get her doors blown off by a boy is bound to come. If she ever takes up competitive skiing she'll have another opportunity to get smoked by the boys.

For my son the opportunity to compete against "non-girls" is real win-win for him. He can hold back and risk letting his team down or getting embarrassed because he isn't going 100%. Or he can slam some "non-girl" to the turf or take her out with a slide tackle and be a "real tough guy" for beating up on the "non-girl." Yeah team LGBTQxyz.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I bet Rousey would drop you like a bad habit in under 20 seconds.
I’ll bet the worst player on the ENBA could outplay you with one hand behind their back.
Any female boxer would smoke you before the first round is over.

Stop thinking your prick makes you superior.

And if Rousey had to fight in a genderless bantam weight division, nobody would know her name. Why do you want to take these opportunities away from women? Luckily for the WNBA, they don't have to compete against the NBA G League players.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I bet Rousey would drop you like a bad habit in under 20 seconds.
I’ll bet the worst player on the ENBA could outplay you with one hand behind their back.
Any female boxer would smoke you before the first round is over.

Stop thinking your prick makes you superior.

Damn you are ignorant to fault.
Now he is trying to pit expert against average to support his argument.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It's good for a lark - see Martina Navratilova vs Jimmy Connors. It's not just the capacity to compete. We've already had issues with women changing with "non-women" in the women's locker room. As I've said, "they" are welcome set up their own non-gender leagues. It's not like coed sports are something new, we've just never had sanctioned, professional, etc coed sports.

Why is the left so anxious to ensure that "non-men" get the opportunity to compete against women in athletics? Luckily my girl hasn't had to compete against boys in track yet, but I live in the Denver Metro area, so her opportunity get her doors blown off by a boy is bound to come. If she ever takes up competitive skiing she'll have another opportunity to get smoked by the boys.

For my son the opportunity to compete against "non-girls" is real win-win for him. He can hold back and risk letting his team down or getting embarrassed because he isn't going 100%. Or he can slam some "non-girl" to the turf or take her out with a slide tackle and be a "real tough guy" for beating up on the "non-girl." Yeah team LGBTQxyz.

The left side of government is all about supporting anyone for votes, they have no shame and they really don't care what or who votes for them. Why is Rob holding on so tight. Perhaps he is *****? Who knows. I am sure about one thing, he has an agenda. Something has to be in it for him to care enough to support it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The left side of government is all about supporting anyone for votes, they have no shame and they really don't care what or who votes for them. Why is Rob holding on so tight. Perhaps he is *****? Who knows. I am sure about one thing, he has an agenda. Something has to be in it for him to care enough to support it.

Both sides are doing anything for votes. Unfortunately, the 2 party system is so entrenched they're getting away with this craziness.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Damn you are ignorant to fault.
Now he is trying to pit expert against average to support his argument.

Men are superior. That's your argument.
No one is any more an expert than you. That was another of your arguments.

You are (or at least say you are) a man.
You are (or at least say you are) an expert.
You should do just fine against the women I mentioned.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Men are superior. That's your argument.
No one is any more an expert than you. That was another of your arguments.

You are (or at least say you are) a man.
You are (or at least say you are) an expert.
You should do just fine against the women I mentioned.

You're just grasping at straws at this point to be"right"

 

[chillin 10+ year member]

Sorry Rob, while I agree with you on quite a few topics, this isn't one of them. Most sports leagues aren't men only, they are just the top athletes. NHL, MLB, NBA, NFL, etc. Any team in any of these leagues would allow women to play if they were good enough to be an asset. I believe the Montreal Canadiens has a female goalie that played a couple exhibition games, but never a meaningful game.

I'm all for a person born in the wrong body being able to make a change but if athletics is their main pursuit in life, that change may have to wait a few years until they're finished with pro sports. Or they make they change and don't get to compete at a professional level.