What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Talk about choosing your hill to die on.

You will defend to your death your belief that of only two options, one is not a choice, but the other is.

A complete and obvious failure of logic from the word go, but then you’ll write paragraphs trying to justify the belief.
It’s just plain silly to work so hard to build your argument on a false premise.

Do you have any idea why you do it so often?
I hear you professor. Please educate us on what human *** is for primarily.

This should be good.
 
I think the problem is you're hung up an illogical position. Clearly it isn't a logical position, but not everybody works on logic or the word be a much more sensible place.

The whole LGBTQxyz thing is a giant exercise in the illogical. I "identify" as woman, therefore I am?!?!?! Seriously that's crazy talk.
It's crazy talk, but we live under the guise that our brains do what our bodies command, or that our body and brain act in synchrony.
That doesn't account for the reality that they don't always do. You said yourself that you didn't have to choose to like females, yet there are people who will tell you that their very first inclination was to be attracted to the same ***. Hard to believe that they are lying, and what would the benefit be to pretend you like girls when you're supposed to like boys, or vice versa?

We all start off female, and then either stay female or become male. To think that the brain and the *** organs are absolutely linked is just childish on his part.
 
I hear you professor. Please educate us on what human *** is for primarily.

This should be good.
I don't have to be a professor to know that the physical *** act and ****** orientation are two different things.

Maybe go back to school and learn some basics before you come up with more false theories that you insist are fact, plebe.

Like I said, your theories fall apart under even the simplest of scrutiny. It's pathetic.
And before you try the "Oh, Robgmn said it, so it must be fact" shit, I'll share an example right here:
You claim that ****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with.
Your theory falls apart with one simple question: How then is ****** orientation determined for people who have no *** organs, or both sets?
The excuse that those people are outliers or should just be happy to be alive doesn't work. If you are going to state an absolute, then your absolute must cover all possible scenarios.

You can't say "A always causes B. Except when it doesn't".
If there is a "When it doesn't", then your original claim is bunk.
Make sense?
 
Last edited:
It's crazy talk, but we live under the guise that our brains do what our bodies command, or that our body and brain act in synchrony.
That doesn't account for the reality that they don't always do. You said yourself that you didn't have to choose to like females, yet there are people who will tell you that their very first inclination was to be attracted to the same ***. Hard to believe that they are lying, and what would the benefit be to pretend you like girls when you're supposed to like boys, or vice versa?

We all start off female, and then either stay female or become male. To think that the brain and the *** organs are absolutely linked is just childish on his part.

My homosexual friends all say they didn't have a choice. I take their word for it. I've never heard a hetero person say they chose hetero over ****.

That said let's assume person X was born a women in a man's body. X decides to address this issue with hormones, surgery, etc to become a woman. Fine, but X is are asking the world to accept them as a biological female and they are not. X is really an extremely feminized man or former man or whatever, but X is not really a woman.
 
I don't have to be a professor to know that the physical *** act and ****** orientation are two different things.

You do actually because you are trying to school me.
Maybe go back to school and learn some basics before you come up with more false theories that you insist are fact, plebe.
Which version of Plebe are you going with?
Like I said, your theories fall apart under even the simplest of scrutiny. It's pathetic.
And before you try the "Oh, Robgmn said it, so it must be fact" shit, I'll share an example right here:
You claim that ****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with.
Reeeeaaaalllllyyyyyy. Is that your interpretation of my view? That ****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with? I didn't claim that but you keep insisting I did. I have to say again you do not comprehend what I posted. If you did, you'd stop being a diick.
Your theory falls apart with one simple question: How then is ****** orientation determined for people who have no *** organs, or both sets?
The excuse that those people are outliers or should just be happy to be alive doesn't work. If you are going to state an absolute, then your absolute must cover all possible scenarios.
Jesus Christ. How do your mutations have ***? How do they have or get pleasure sexually?
You can't say "A always causes B. Except when it doesn't".
If there is a "When it doesn't", then your original claim is bunk.
Make sense?
Rob, what is the human male penis for?
Rob, what is the female womb for?
 
You do actually because you are trying to school me.

Which version of Plebe are you going with?
One who lacks knowledge.
Reeeeaaaalllllyyyyyy. Is that your interpretation of my view? That ****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with? I didn't claim that but you keep insisting I did. I have to say again you do not comprehend what I posted. If you did, you'd stop being a diick.
No, not an "interpretation" at all. These are your words: "If a woman is born with a V she is heterosexual UNTIL she CHOOSES to be gay."
heterosexual - sexually or romantically attracted exclusively to people of the other ***.

By your statement, a woman born with a V is by default sexually or romantically attracted exclusively to people of the other ***.
So yes, your view absolutely IS "****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with". You have literally stated it on this forum.

Jesus Christ. How do your mutations have ***? How do they have or get pleasure sexually?
Well, I guess they must first choose who they are attracted to. By the rules you stated and I quoted above, how do they choose without having *** organs of their own?

Rob, what is the human male penis for?
Rob, what is the female womb for?
The male penis is for the ejection of various fluids from the body, to include urine, blood, semen, spermatazoa, and likely others.
The uterus is where the ***** matures.

What do either have to do with whether someone is homosexual or heterosexual?
 
Last edited:
One who lacks knowledge.
Kettle... you are black.
No, not an "interpretation" at all. These are your words: "If a woman is born with a V she is heterosexual UNTIL she CHOOSES to be gay."
heterosexual - sexually or romantically attracted exclusively to people of the other ***.

By your statement, a woman born with a V is by default sexually or romantically attracted exclusively to people of the other ***.
So yes, your view absolutely IS "****** orientation is based on the *** organs you are born with". You have literally stated it on this forum.
Good, you finally got something clear.
Well, I guess they must first choose who they are attracted to. By the rules you stated and I quoted above, how do they choose without having *** organs of their own?
But that would be pointless. That can't have ***. They can't enjoy ***. They are irrelevant to the argument/conversation.
The male penis is for the ejection of various fluids from the body, to include urine, blood, semen, spermatazoa, and likely others.
The uterus is where the ***** matures.

What do either have to do with whether someone is homosexual or heterosexual?
For the reasons I have stated. I am so glad your steel trap memory is working so well.
How does the ***** get in the womb... naturally Rob?
 
Kettle... you are black.
Not so much, kid.
Good, you finally got something clear.
Hmmm, it's what I've heard you claim all along: The *** organs determine ****** orientation.
And you are wrong. See below.

But that would be pointless. That can't have ***. They can't enjoy ***. They are irrelevant to the argument/conversation.
That doesn't speak to the question, and it's not true. Plenty of paralyzed guys still have ****** relations with their women.
So...if ****** orientation is based on the parts ya' get (per your theory), what happens to those who get none or get both?

For the reasons I have stated. I am so glad your steel trap memory is working so well.
How does the ***** get in the womb... naturally Rob?
Again reinforcing your feelings that the organs determine ****** orientation. The theory that falls apart with one simple question.

How does it get there? The ***** forms in the womb.
Do you really know nothing about ANY of this stuff?
 
Not so much, kid.
Yeah.
Hmmm, it's what I've heard you claim all along: The *** organs determine ****** orientation.
And you are wrong. See below.
I am not wrong.
That doesn't speak to the question, and it's not true. Plenty of paralyzed guys still have ****** relations with their women.
So...if ****** orientation is based on the parts ya' get (per your theory), what happens to those who get none or get both?
Really??? I literally answered that.
Again reinforcing your feelings that the organs determine ****** orientation. The theory that falls apart with one simple question.

How does it get there? The ***** forms in the womb.
Do you really know nothing about ANY of this stuff?
What caused the ***** to form naturally, Rob?
 
Last edited:
Yeah.

I am not wrong.
If your theory can’t speak to a very real possibility like I referenced, then your theory is wrong.
Absolutes require absolutes, not “excepts”.
Really??? I literally answered that.
No, you didn’t. “They should be happy to be alive” or “they shouldn’t have a ****** orientation” do not answer the question at all.
Which means your theory is bullshit.
What caused the ***** to form naturally, Rob?
Who said it formed naturally? You ever hear of test tube babies carried by surrogate mothers?
Welcome to reality. Maybe both you and Buck should catch up to it.

But your attempted sidetrack is a silly strawman that speaks nothing to your silly theory on ****** orientation.
Your aggressive ignorance is a sad commentary on today's society.
 
Last edited:
If your theory can’t speak to a very real possibility like I referenced, then your theory is wrong.
Absolutes require absolutes, not “excepts”.
You adding and creating scenarios just to argue. Good job getting off point.
No, you didn’t. “They should be happy to be alive” or “they shouldn’t have a ****** orientation” do not answer the question at all.
Which means your theory is bullshit.
"But that would be pointless. That can't have ***. They can't enjoy ***. They are irrelevant to the argument/conversation." <---- THE GOD DAMN ANSWER. Just stfu. If you are going to ignore every answer given as if none were given then just stfu and stop flapping your irrelevant mouth.
Who said it formed naturally? You ever hear of test tube babies carried by surrogate mothers?
Welcome to reality. Maybe both you and Buck should catch up to it.
Now you are again changing shit so you don't look dumb. Too late. I said it formed naturally you jackasss. I specifically ask you about it being natural so you would have to answer literally and correctly but you can't do that, you have to spin it cause you are a clown. A diick eating clown.
But your attempted sidetrack is a silly strawman that speaks nothing to your silly theory on ****** orientation.
You have *** with men, on the regular. It's a natural choice for you. You said it yourself.
 
You adding and creating scenarios just to argue. Good job getting off point.
"Adding scenarios"? You DO realize that an absolute like you claim has to cover ALL scenarios, don't you? This is really not that difficult.
Ever hear of the Law Of Conservation of Energy? It doesn't include "except..."
If you are going to state that the *** organs determine orientation, then you have to account for people who don't have them, or have both.
Simple logic.
Reality shreds your theory.
"But that would be pointless. That can't have ***. They can't enjoy ***. They are irrelevant to the argument/conversation." <---- THE GOD DAMN ANSWER. Just stfu. If you are going to ignore every answer given as if none were given then just stfu and stop flapping your irrelevant mouth.
Ahhh, but they can. Plenty of paralyzed men and women still have ****** relations with their partner. Once again, reality shreds your theory.
Now you are again changing shit so you don't look dumb. Too late. I said it formed naturally you jackasss. I specifically ask you about it being natural so you would have to answer literally and correctly but you can't do that, you have to spin it cause you are a clown. A diick eating clown.
Your limited command of the language lets you down yet again. You attempted a rhetorical question, but the implied answer was incorrect.
Even if you were trying to say natural conception requires intercourse, you are wrong.
You really DON'T have a clue about human sexuality. So much for your biology degree with "extensive study" in human anatomy, eh?
Cute ********** ad-hominem for a guy who claims to be so accepting of homoseuxuality.
You have *** with men, on the regular. It's a natural choice for you. You said it yourself.
It's so fun when you get all triggered like a petulant child, as I just shred your posts like a block of mozzarella.

The list grows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
804,165
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top