Sorry kid, but the article you posted does not prove your theory. In fact, it says quite the opposite of your theory.
And I quote directly from it:
“In some species, like cats and rabbits, physical stimulation is needed to prompt the egg to be released—a phenomenon called induced ovulation. But in humans, ovulation happens spontaneously (without stimulation), often on a regular schedule.”
“She speculates that spontaneous ovulation likely evolved in the last common ancestor of primates and rodents.”
We are not cats or rabbits. We are humans.
Don’t present what you consider proof (an article about a study) to the table when it contradicts your thesis.
You see? You can’t just Google an answer. You have to understand the quest, and have to be able to understand any texts Google leads you to.
Try again.