What is?

[SlugButter]

My point is that you are quoting a source that ls KNOWN FOR SPREADING MISINFORMATION ABOUT COVID with a right-wing tilt.
You say you "care...the information is accurate" but are quoting a source that is KNOWN FOR SPREADING MISINFORMATION ABOUT COVID.

What is the "facts and real science" in the article you shared? How is it verified?

I’m genuinely interested in how to find out how someone knows what misinformation actually is. My cousin is a doctor and won’t take the vaccine, and is even quitting her job over it. She claims that taking the vaccine after already having covid isn’t a good idea, not that the vaccine is inherently bad in itself. I’m finding intriguing information on both sides of this issue. I have another cousin who is a nurse practitioner, and she recommends strongly that I get it. I’m so damn confused.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yeah, I second that. I use what I use as sources, because it matches my independent research. That's the thing is that I listen to every angle that I can find, put it all in a pot, and heat the bot until all of the BS burns off, and I'm left with nothing but purity. That's how I do my research and how I wind up with my conclusions.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It doesn't matter what side you're on, or aren't on, the MRNA shot programs your cells to produce the spike proteins that are originally from a gain of function bioweapon.

It stinks when the source is automatically questioned, instead of the information that the source has. That's dumb tribalism that's gonna wreck our nation (and currently is). People always point out the one thing they can potentially find wrong, like it invalidates all information, instead of actually discussing the information, so we wind up going nowhere, ever.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It doesn't matter what side you're on, or aren't on, the MRNA shot programs your cells to produce the spike proteins that are originally from a gain of function bioweapon.

It stinks when the source is automatically questioned, instead of the information that the source has. That's dumb tribalism that's gonna wreck our nation (and currently is). People always point out the one thing they can potentially find wrong, like it invalidates all information, instead of actually discussing the information, so we wind up going nowhere, ever.

The source should always automatically be questioned. It’s called critical thinking and due diligence. Read all about the people you are using to support your feelings about Covid and vaccination. Some key takeaways: 1. they are ripping people off by selling Ivermectin through secondary channels 2. They promoted hydroxychlor without any basis of proof of efficacy 3. The founder was arrested for a traitorous act on Jan 6th.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.c...ine-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/?amp=true

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yeah, I second that. I use what I use as sources, because it matches my independent research. That's the thing is that I listen to every angle that I can find, put it all in a pot, and heat the bot until all of the BS burns off, and I'm left with nothing but purity. That's how I do my research and how I wind up with my conclusions.

What are your independent studies? Can you share the methodology, the number of people involved in the studies and their demographics, including control group, test group, etc?

You mention you boil off the BS, but then you use a known scam group like AFLDS as a point of reference to support your argument.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

COVID misinformation... Hmmm. I think the only people who know about COVID information are:

A. The people who created it.
B. The people who encouraged it to be created.
C. The CDC
D. The Doctors and Scientist working directly with the virus.

Not CNN, FOX News, NBC, ABC, CBS, Bloggers, Twitchers, Streamers, Woke idiots, Blue haired morons, or the majority of the citizens of these united states. So ANYONE who is not A,B,C or D is spreading second hand misinformation in my opinion. We only know what we are told about COVID and that could be complete horsecrap for all we know. The only way we will know anything about it is if we can hook up with a hot Chinese Wuhan lab whore, or CDC chick, or with whomever encouraged the virus and it's leak. One thing is absolutely for sure. There is always someone who knows everything. So who has the most to lose if we get all the answers about COVID?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

COVID misinformation... Hmmm. I think the only people who know about COVID information are:

A. The people who created it.
B. The people who encouraged it to be created.
C. The CDC
D. The Doctors and Scientist working directly with the virus.

Not CNN, FOX News, NBC, ABC, CBS, Bloggers, Twitchers, Streamers, Woke idiots, Blue haired morons, or the majority of the citizens of these united states. So ANYONE who is not A,B,C or D is spreading second hand misinformation in my opinion. We only know what we are told about COVID and that could be complete horsecrap for all we know. The only way we will know anything about it is if we can hook up with a hot Chinese Wuhan lab whore, or CDC chick, or with whomever encouraged the virus and it's leak. One thing is absolutely for sure. There is always someone who knows everything. So who has the most to lose if we get all the answers about COVID?

Ironic that you talk about misinformation, and the very first source of COVID info on your list is "the people who created it".

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Ironic that you talk about misinformation, and the very first source of COVID info on your list is "the people who created it".

COVID came out of a lab, get used to it, because that’s the truth.

 

[jmc0369]

Ironic that you talk about misinformation, and the very first source of COVID info on your list is "the people who created it".

Several pages back I laid down down several links of the blue check variety that support the lab origin hypothesis. You may not be persuaded by them (if you actually read them) and that's fine. But what should be understood, and is irrefutable, is that the entire media complex (news and entertainment), the entire chemical complex (Petro/Pharma/Pyro/Agri) is owned by the same financial entities. There is a motive to influence the perception of reality by the masses. They have unfathomable financial resources and the ability to influence who sits on any board of significance. This is not a theory, this is reality and anyone can spend 10 minutes confirming it on their own personal tracking device.

Many blue check-type authors have written great books that tell us the nature of that power structure. If someone doesn't want to accept that as reality at this point, it's willful ignorance. Corporate media is a sham that peddles consumption of bing bank-funded war, pharmaceuticals, petroleum, and conventional agriculture.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Big tech is anti-American, because they want you to be enslaved or completely controlled by their will. The USA is based around individual rights (should be, we have problems), and big tech doesn't want you to have rights. They want you to serve their interests only.

Many people won't understand how bad the technocracy is. It's just gonna be too late once everyone catches up to what's happened and still happening.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ironic that you talk about misinformation, and the very first source of COVID info on your list is "the people who created it".

Imagine that. If the virus didn't appear in nature that means it had to be made... who could make such a thing.

Ironic that you talk about misinformation, and the very first source of COVID info on your list is "the people who created it".

Well let's see. In reports that Fauci quoted the virus did not appear naturally and the virus they started with that only affected animals was played around with and other things were mixed with it to make the virus able to infect humans. I don't know how you comprehend this chain of events but I don't see it being a natural chain of events. Unless you think it is natural for humans to modify viruses to make them deadly to humans. I can see you defending it though... just seems like something you would do.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

COVID came out of a lab, get used to it, because that’s the truth.

"The truth" based on what information? You have the inside line on this thing from the word "go"?
Please cite your sources.

 

[jmc0369]

Big tech is anti-American, because they want you to be enslaved or completely controlled by their will. The USA is based around individual rights (should be, we have problems), and big tech doesn't want you to have rights. They want you to serve their interests only.

Many people won't understand how bad the technocracy is. It's just gonna be too late once everyone catches up to what's happened and still happening.

It is a shame, and certainly demonstrable that the education system does not have our best interest at heart. If it did, it would be informing us/our kids the history of collectivists governments; It would be spelling out the real power structure in history. In fact what we have are "teachers" ( the most brainwashed demographic) dressing up in pedantic "spirit" day colors herding kids like steer into a gated indoctrination camp, saying ra-ra-ree, teaching from large font, image-filled glossy paged bull shit books. Look at textbooks from the 1950s and before. Most college grads don't even read anymore.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"The truth" based on what information? You have the inside line on this thing from the word "go"?
Please cite your sources.

Fauci confirmed the Wuhan lab took a virus that only infected animals, added to it to enable it to now infect humans. How it got out of the lab is unknown.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Imagine that. If the virus didn't appear in nature that means it had to be made... who could make such a thing.

Well let's see. In reports that Fauci quoted the virus did not appear naturally and the virus they started with that only affected animals was played around with and other things were mixed with it to make the virus able to infect humans. I don't know how you comprehend this chain of events but I don't see it being a natural chain of events. Unless you think it is natural for humans to modify viruses to make them deadly to humans. I can see you defending it though... just seems like something you would do.

I would be interested in you citing your sources. To this day, Fauci says it is far more likely that that the virus is a natural mutation.
It would be interesting to see your proof that he is claiming it is man made, but is a natural mutation.

Here is an actual quoted sentence of Dr Fauci's from June 2021: “the most likely origin is from an animal species to a human but I keep an absolutely open mind that there may be other origins,”

Please explain how you "comprehend a chain of events" and translate that to "Fauci quoted the virus did not appear naturally".