Do you have a source to back up your claim that doing one’s own research might make oneself smarter? I think I need a non-conspiracy, peer reviewed, officially authoritative source claiming self research can cause self education. How am I supposed to believe you without proof?
I posted the information for him. I think he has some special button that he hits to block other peoples proof and facts.
But they are not controlled by the government as far as being able to censor what gets listed to their website. That’s the “private” part.
Yes they are controlled by the gov
Nope they are not regulated by the government but you have those who work there with an ideology that leans heavily to the left which is why those things get taken down. Also when you decide what gets to stay and what doesn’t get to stay, that makes you a publisher. Which means section 230 protections go out the window. That means you can now be sued. The phone company doesn’t drop your call and make a text not go through cause they don’t like what you say. They let it all fly which allows them to be covered under section 230 protections
‘The lawsuit claims the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department’s Global Engagement Center and the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency colluded with social-media platforms “in hundreds of meetings about misinformation” and systematically flagged “huge quantities of First Amendment-protected speech to platforms for censorship,” The Journal reported.’
nypost.com
Yes. And the lizard people with the 5G nano particles from the vax.
brownstone.org
Has that been legally established? The last time I looked closely at it (when Trump wanted to make companies liable for what was posted, thereby forcing the censorship to occur), it was a lot of back-and-forth on whether FB is a publisher or platform.
theintercept.com
www.paul.senate.gov
reclaimthenet.org
reason.com
