What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'm not calling you personally stupid.

OTOH, going round and round for dozens of posts about what does or doesn't constitute choice is stupid.

As I said before, either he's being disingenuous or cannot grasp concepts like "in" or that if one chooses to be gay, then (by definition) you would also have to choose not to be gay. And if somebody can't grasp the concept of what a choice i, then how can that person grasp the concept of "non-choice" or that something that is choice for one person might be a "non-choice" for another?

Now the 236k jobs created in March weren't really created in March. Feel free to go around and around about the definition of job, the definition of create, that everybody uses the bls job creation stat, etc. Since astrophysicists claim time is a human construct perhaps the job has always existed since the big bang and nobody can claim any credit.

BINGO. Like the law of conservation of energy, the jobs have always existed, but just in different forms

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Thxone’s very insightful questions:
“What were these unemployed people doing before? How did they survive?
Again you said "new jobs". What "new jobs"???
What is this LIST of "new jobs"? All these people that weren't employed... so why did they suddenly decide to work?
Where did all these people come from suddenly who are willing to work?
So is it the same census that hands out dollar bills?
Are you counting these internet "jobs" as "jobs"... like content creators, pod cast, streamers and the like?
Weren't these people there the whole time or did we suddenly have an influx of new workers? If these people were there the whole time... what were they doing BEFORE these "new jobs" appeared out of thin air??”

None of these have anything to do with his goal of desperately trying to say the economic figures are not accurate, lest they paint the Biden administration in a positive light.
And…they all were answered at least once, sometimes more than once.

Seems that even the whining is a lie.

No, this is a list of questions you couldn't google answers for apparently and since you couldn't you didn't answer them. You gave vague opinions.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Jimi, Rob, you are two of a kind. You should have no problems having a conversation with each other. Just remember to reciprocate the reach around.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, this is a list of questions you couldn't google answers for apparently and since you couldn't you didn't answer them. You gave vague opinions.

1. You claimed I never answer your questions. These were all answered by me.
That makes you a liar.
2. They were all answered by me AND included references and links to the data so you could see it yourself and not be able to deny the validity.
You failed again.

Stop thinking you are smart enough to answer questions and make theories without having resources.
FFS, you can’t even get it right when you are GIVEN resources to refer to.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

1. You claimed I never answer your questions. These were all answered by me.
That makes you a liar.
2. They were all answered by me AND included references and links to the data so you could see it yourself and not be able to deny the validity.
You failed again.

Better add it to the list secretary man.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Better add it to the list secretary man.

Already there. Right along with choice without a choice, and How do new jobs get filled? Where do the people come from? and Do jobs just appear out of thin air?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Already there. Right along with choice without a choice, and How do new jobs get filled? Where do the people come from? and Do jobs just appear out of thin air?

Good, just like a good woman, keep adding to the list. Don't forget the coffee.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Good, just like a good woman, keep adding to the list. Don't forget the coffee.

Impressed you didn’t spell it covfefe like your lord and savior.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Impressed you didn’t spell it covfefe like your lord and savior.

I am my own God.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am my own God.

Since you believe he is right about everything else, why deviate?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

'They also do not want farmers to know they are setting them up. The lobbyists opposing this bill (see below) are pushing to shut this bill down because factory mega-farmers like Bill Gates (see here), the CCP, and others want to put vaccines in your food.'

Eat Your Vaccines!… I Mean Vegetables!

… Said Bill Gates

tomrenz.substack.com

'Now an oral route of administration is being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA in cow’s milk.'

Chinese Load Cow's Milk with mRNA Exosomes--Successfully Immunize Mice

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Assault Possible Through Food Supply

petermcculloughmd.substack.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Since you believe he is right about everything else, why deviate?

I'll bite. Who are you referencing?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Then we must determine a set of metrics that we all agree on, which can be used to judge the successes and/or failures of a POTUS and of his administration.

I'm sure you'd get 10 answers if you asked 8 people, but I'm also sure there are metrics that could be universally agreed on. I'd say that the economy is one of them. Maybe the MOST important one. It can paint the big picture of whether we thrived or struggled during the POTUS's term. If the economy is shit, then most other metrics don't matter much for the average person.

Another might be foreign relations. Did the administration do things that improved foreign relations (which in turn can improve our economy and standing as a world power)?

Another might regard the creation or dissolution of laws for the common good. Were new laws of any type created that help us? Alternately, were laws ended to the benefit of all (or most)?

Another might be how they led the country in a time of crisis (pretty subjective, but there certainly are facts that can be looked at).

Maybe whether or not they delivered on their campaign promises?

I don't think we can or should agree to a set of metrics to measure the POTUS. Pretty much impossible since I would consider gun control measures success and other would scream bloody murder. Wouldn't looking at policy, data, results, etc be more productive. I'd rather measure the effectiveness of policy(s) than the POTUS.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I don't think we can or should agree to a set of metrics to measure the POTUS. Pretty much impossible since I would consider gun control measures success and other would scream bloody murder. Wouldn't looking at policy, data, results, etc be more productive. I'd rather measure the effectiveness of policy(s) than the POTUS.

I’m all about data and results.
Policy can be tough, though. As you inferred, one person’s idea of success may be another person’s idea of a right being trampled (while they simultaneously applaud a different right being trampled).

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'll bite. Who are you referencing?

Trump, and the covfefe controversy.