What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So your feeling is that he made fun of his disorder specifically? You watched the video right? Or did you just read the article and view a picture of this alleged mocking of this reporters affliction?

For the record I give Trump a pass on this one. IMHO, his back peddling actually looks worse than the original video.

 

[El Wapo]

So your feeling is that he made fun of his disorder specifically? You watched the video right? Or did you just read the article and view a picture of this alleged mocking of this reporters affliction?

I am sure he has never looked for any factual information....as no lib as ever looked for the truth. Facts and kryptonite to libs. Bobby proves this daily for all to see. He has no shame and less intelligence.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

1. I don't know you.
Your name is probably Rob.
2. Why would you think Trump is lying? What he was doing is not the mannerisms of that reporters affliction. They would be more in line with Parkinson's.

Fetterman's stroke is political... It can affect his job.

I am in the fast lane, wanna try and keep up?

1. We've never met in-person. Unlike Trump and Kovaleski. "Donald and I were on a first-name basis for years. I’ve interviewed him in his office. I’ve talked to him at press conferences. All in all, I would say around a dozen times, I’ve interacted with him as a reporter while I was at The Daily News."

And before you say "Donald is very important and busy and this reporter was not important enough to remember", keep in mind that Donald said he has 'one of the great memories of all-time'. A great memory does not forget a dozen interactions.

2. Why would he need mannerisms to describe someone who was "grovel grovel grovel"-ing when Kovaleski had no reason to grovel? he NEVER retracted his story regardign Trump's lies about seeing people "dancing int he street" in Jersey City on 9/11. WHAT would he "grovel" about?
And, groveling does NOT looking like someone having loss of muscle control, or having their wrist bent like Kovaleskis.
Groveling - lie or crawl abjectly on the ground with one's face downward. Act in an obsequious way in order to obtain someone's forgiveness or favor
Again, Kovaleski stood by his article, yet "groveled" to Trump? For WHAT?


Fetterman's stroke is political? His doctor confirmed his cognitive abilities were fine. Why do you think his job could be affected?
Steven Hawking was folded into a pretzel but was one of the smartest men in history. Do you think his theories should have been ignored because of his physical situation?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am sure he has never looked for any factual information....as no lib as ever looked for the truth. Facts and kryptonite to libs. Bobby proves this daily for all to see. He has no shame and less intelligence.View attachment 44600

Dude, you can't even put a thought up here without posting a fvcking meme.
For all you've shown here, you're a kid with an IQ of 85.
Try to contribute some thoughts before you comment on ANYONE else.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

1. We've never met in-person. Unlike Trump and Kovaleski. "Donald and I were on a first-name basis for years. I’ve interviewed him in his office. I’ve talked to him at press conferences. All in all, I would say around a dozen times, I’ve interacted with him as a reporter while I was at The Daily News."

And before you say "Donald is very important and busy and this reporter was not important enough to remember", keep in mind that Donald said he has 'one of the great memories of all-time'. A great memory ry does not forget a dozen interactions.

2. Why would he need mannerisms to describe someone who was "grovel grovel grovel"-ing when Kovaleski had no reason to grovel? he NEVER retracted his story regardign Trump's lies about seeing people "dancing int he street" in Jersey City on 9/11. WHAT would he "grovel" about?
And, groveling does NOT looking like someone having loss of muscle control, or having their wrist bent like Kovaleskis.
Groveling - lie or crawl abjectly on the ground with one's face downward. Act in an obsequious way in order to obtain someone's forgiveness or favor
Again, Kovaleski stood by his article, yet "groveled" to Trump? For WHAT?


Fetterman's stroke is political? His doctor confirmed his cognitive abilities were fine. Why do you think his job could be affected?
Steven Hawking was folded into a pretzel but was one of the smartest men in history. Do you think his theories should have been ignored because of his physical situation?

1. The reporter is claiming to have known Trump personally. That does not mean Trump knows him personally.

2. Well others see it different.

Fetterman... You can take his doctors word for it OR you can watch Fetterman speak. Strokes can lead to mental illnesses. He is already, visually, lacking.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

1. The reporter is claiming to have known Trump personally. That does not mean Trump knows him personally.

2. Well others see it different.

Fetterman... You can take his doctors word for it OR you can watch Fetterman speak. Strokes can lead to mental illnesses. He is already, visually, lacking.

So what you are saying is that despite all of the circumstances showing that Trump did indeed mock this guy, you will just ignore it because...Trump.
But are SURE Biden is a ********* because he treats children like a grandfather treats children.
And are SURE massive voter fraud occurred even though NO proof can be found.
And are SURE Fetterman is incapable despite what his doctor says, because of your expert analysis based on his speaking.
And are SURE Trump never took Classified documents (even after Trump and his attorneys admitted to him doing it).

It's pretty easy to see that you make your decisions on your feelings and what you WANT to see, as opposed to any critical thinking.
Anything that paints Trump or any Republican in a bad light is bullshit, but anything you can use to say Democrats are bad is immediately "truth".
Pretty transparent.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So what you are saying is that despite all of the circumstances showing that Trump did indeed mock this guy, you will just ignore it because...Trump.
But are SURE Biden is a ********* because he treats children like a grandfather treats children.
And are SURE massive voter fraud occurred even though NO proof can be found.
And are SURE Fetterman is incapable despite what his doctor says, because of your expert analysis based on his speaking.
And are SURE Trump never took Classified documents (even after Trump and his attorneys admitted to him doing it).

It's pretty easy to see that you make your decisions on your feelings and what you WANT to see, as opposed to any critical thinking.
Anything that paints Trump or any Republican in a bad light is bullshit, but anything you can use to say Democrats are bad is immediately "truth".
Pretty transparent.

I am going to give you some help, for free... this one time.

Instead of leading your post with "So what you are saying is....." I want you to lead with "Are you saying....?" that way you are actually engaging in an conversation as apposed to just being a pompous ***.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am going to give you some help, for free... this one time.

Instead of leading your post with "So what you are saying is....." I want you to lead with "Are you saying....?" that way you are actually engaging in an conversation as apposed to just being a pompous ***.

That would be great, except you pretty much refuse to answer any direct question I ask you. You also demand that your words be interpreted because you are at times being literal, at times being metaphorical, at times being humorous, at times being figurative. Sometimes several within the same post.
When I tell you I want an answer, you tell me that I can't tell you what to do.

I will give YOU some help: if you WANT me to ask you direct questions, then at least answer them when I DO ask them. Otherwise, stop crying that I am not asking you direct questions.
When you complain I don't ask questions after you have refused to answer most of my questions, your complaint is IRONIC.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

That would be great, except you pretty much refuse to answer any direct question I ask you. You also demand that your words be interpreted because you are at times being literal, at times being metaphorical, at times being humorous, at times being figurative. Sometimes several within the same post.
When I tell you I want an answer, you tell me that I can't tell you what to do.

if you WANT me to ask you direct questions, then at least answer them when I DO ask them. Otherwise, stop crying that I am not asking you direct questions.
When you complain I don't ask questions after you have refused to answer most of my questions, your complaint is IRONIC.

Would not it have been easier to just say you prefer to speak for people instead writing all of this. Just be honest with us Rob.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Would not it have been easier to just say you prefer to speak for people instead writing all of this. Just be honest with us Rob.

I like how you completely ignore the fact that you are again complaining ironically.
You KNOW you have refused to answer so many of my questions, yet cry that I am not asking you questions. It gets pointed out, you try to turn it into a thinly veiled insult of me.

You are pretty transparent kid. So, here we go.

WHY do you say it is only "alleged" that Trump had classified documents when Trump and his lawyers have admitted it publicly?

WHY do you say Trump is not guilty of any ****** impropriety when he admitted it, and was accused through legal channels by multiple women AND a teenager, yet are sure that Biden is a ********* with no such admittance, no such accusations?

WHY do you think you are better qualified to diagnose Fetterman through seeing him on TV than his doctor who is doing in-person and hands-on diagnoses?

WHY would you believe wholeheartedly in massive voter fraud that resulted in Biden being elected, when: 1) there is absolutely no proof of it 2) the logistics of it make it pretty much impossible 3) Democrats int he US outnumber Republicans by MILLIONS?

And keep this in mind before you refuse to answer, that you JUST complained I am deciphering instead of asking.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I like how you completely ignore the fact that you are again complaining ironically.
You KNOW you have refused to answer so many of my questions, yet cry that I am not asking you questions. It gets pointed out, you try to turn it into a thinly veiled insult of me.

You are pretty transparent kid. So, here we go.

WHY do you say it is only "alleged" that Trump had classified documents when Trump and his lawyers have admitted it publicly?

WHY do you say Trump is not guilty of any ****** impropriety when he admitted it, and was accused through legal channels by multiple women AND a teenager, yet are sure that Biden is a ********* with no such admittance, no such accusations?

WHY do you think you are better qualified to diagnose Fetterman through seeing him on TV than his doctor who is doing in-person and hands-on diagnoses?

WHY would you believe wholeheartedly in massive voter fraud that resulted in Biden being elected, when: 1) there is absolutely no proof of it 2) the logistics of it make it pretty much impossible 3) Democrats int he US outnumber Republicans by MILLIONS?

And keep this in mind before you refuse to answer, that you JUST complained I am deciphering instead of asking.

Once again you make a statement completely rooted in your being arrogant. You think because I am speaking to you that by default I am complaining. Here is my complaint... You're and *******.

I don't refuse to answer your questions pal, I don't answer your statements that are vaguely made to look like questions.

Maybe he did have them. Who cares. Trump, Trump, Trump.

I say Trump is not guilty because he has not been convicted in a court of law.

I never said I was better qualified to diagnose Fetterman but I can see with my own two eyes that he ain't all there.

One, just because YOU don't accept the proof does not mean there is no proof. Two, your version of the "logistics" is your convenient and biased way to dismiss the fraud. Three, Do they?

Lastly, fucko, I didn't complain that you were doing anything let alone deciphering. I made a statement that you are YOU are making statements made to look like a question. Which they are not.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Once again you make a statement completely rooted in your being arrogant. You think because I am speaking to you that by default I am complaining. Here is my complaint... You're and *******.

I don't refuse to answer your questions pal, I don't answer your statements that are vaguely made to look like questions.

Maybe he did have them. Who cares. Trump, Trump, Trump.

I say Trump is not guilty because he has not been convicted in a court of law.

I never said I was better qualified to diagnose Fetterman but I can see with my own two eyes that he ain't all there.

One, just because YOU don't accept the proof does not mean there is no proof. Two, your version of the "logistics" is your convenient and biased way to dismiss the fraud. Three, Do they?

Lastly, fucko, I didn't complain that you were doing anything let alone deciphering. I made a statement that you are YOU are making statements made to look like a question. Which they are not.

So, you complain I am not asking you questions, then just give bullshit answers when I very directly ask you questions.

Transparent, and triggered. As usual.
Follow that playbook, kid.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, you complain I am not asking you questions, then just give bullshit answers when I very directly ask you questions.

Transparent, and triggered. As usual.
Follow that playbook, kid.

Wow... so I answer your questions... you tell me yet again, I am complaining and that my answers are bullshit. Then call me a transparent, triggered kid.

So I did what you ask, you responded like this. CLEARLY this was your goal from the word go. Like I said, you are nothing more than an arrogant *******.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Wow... so I answer your questions... you tell me yet again, I am complaining and that my answers are bullshit. Then call me a transparent, triggered kid.

So I did what you ask, you responded like this. CLEARLY this was your goal from the word go. Like I said, you are nothing more than an arrogant *******.

After refusing to answer my questions, you complain I’m not asking questions.
I ask questions and you give near-monosyllabic bullshit answers.
You spend more time on trying to insult me than you do answering the questions.

You act like a fvcking child. An entitled, triggered, crybaby paining the @ss.
And you wonder why I enjoy shredding every stupid post you manage to put up here

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

After refusing to answer my questions, you complain I’m not asking questions.
I ask questions and you give near-monosyllabic bullshit answers.
You spend more time on trying to insult me than you do answering the questions.

You act like a fvcking child. An entitled, triggered, crybaby paining the @ss.
And you wonder why I enjoy shredding every stupid post you manage to put up here

Fuck you punk bitch! You don't dictate how I answer anything. Don't like how I speak to you, Don't like my answers then move the fuck on. This is how I talk to assholes. Show no respect, get no respect.