What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
He brought the gun because he didn't want to get his azz kicked by grown men. You think he would've made a different choice. That gun did nothing but incense the crowd and you know it. What if Rittenhouse was 15? What if he was 12? It's perfectly legal for a 12 year old to carry an AR - 15 and protect themselves.
That wasn't just a "crowd"...Rittenhouse was far from being the only person with a firearm...
 
My moral compass is to look down at liars, criminals, false prophets. Considering that you think the quest for proof, facts, truth is a “leftist view” falls right in line with your continued support of a man who was POTUS and lied over 21,000 documented times to the public.
And I’m sure you ate up every lie.
Is it a “Right-wing view” to hit women, deny servicemembers recourse when the military has screwed them over, borrow valor from others, lie about Trump’s actions, lie about your abilities?
Hmmm, if I have to choose, I’ll take being a leftist. And I’ll even spell it right.

Kyle should not have been there. The history of the people who died has zero relevance to the big picture. Of course, you don’t think in the big picture. You just want Kyle to be a hero, and you’ll deny anything that shows otherwise.
And you’ll do it without having been an eyewitness, which is really weird since you demand to see a **** happen before you’d believe it happened. You know, “because people lie”.

You’re a living contradiction.
This is one of your biggest clumps of shit yet.

I hope you keep a stock of toilet paper around.

You are a blind leftest sheep who thinks he is better and smarter than everyone else.
 
All right for fucks sake!!! You all keep saying he should not have been there. He was "playing COP at 17". Since Rob and Bobby like to make everything political it amazes me this was left out. Probably because it looks bad for Democrats. Kyle was there to defend property. Why? Because Democrats defunded police. Those people are dead because they were stupid and because Democrats were playing fucking games because "Orange Man Bad" Period. There was far less police presence and riots as well as looting were all over America. Kyle was there as an American to protect.

But again, in the Lefts eyes... Kyle was a White Male Trump Supporting Domestic Terrorist with an Assault Rifle.
 
All right for fucks sake!!! You all keep saying he should not have been there. He was "playing COP at 17". Since Rob and Bobby like to make everything political it amazes me this was left out. Probably because it looks bad for Democrats. Kyle was there to defend property. Why? Because Democrats defunded police. Those people are dead because they were stupid and because Democrats were playing fucking games because "Orange Man Bad" Period. There was far less police presence and riots as well as looting were all over America. Kyle was there as an American to protect.

But again, in the Lefts eyes... Kyle was a White Male Trump Supporting Domestic Terrorist with an Assault Rifle.

They just wanna control the argument narrative on something they think they can win on. The governments in those rioting areas allowed the riots to happen, and they were encouraged by big voices in politics and the media. Americans have the right to defend their businesses from destruction with weapons. Many cucks in this nation don’t like Americans taking control over their own destiny; they’re drone-like statists. We’ve seen this movie many times across history, where worship of the state leads to millions of dead in those countries, due to corrupt govs having too much power. It’s all about causing division and going after guns, because those who can defend themselves can’t be ***** by the state.
 
So, you think mass vaccinating people with a shot that hasn’t had human testing is a good idea?
Dude, the anti-vax rhetoric is played out. Literally billions of pieces of evidence show you are wrong. Time to give up on it.

In all seriousness, it’s just making you look the complete fool now.
 
Dude, the anti-vax rhetoric is played out. Literally billions of pieces of evidence show you are wrong. Time to give up on it.

In all seriousness, it’s just making you look the complete fool now.
In all seriousness...if it's true the fda wants to authorize a modified vaccine with zero human testing...that is troublesome...
 
I am guessing the Left's fear mongering of COVID isn't making the dollars anymore so the focus is now student loan debt and Mar-a-Largo.
Fear mongering? Like building a wall to keep out druggie ****** Mexicans? Like banning Asians from flying here from China while allowing Americans? Like trying to ban people from coming here based on their religion? Like overstating crime and terror stats to gain support (Trump supporters fear crime and terror more than other groups)?

That type of fear mongering? Or, being genuinely concerned and making a concerted effort to stop a virus that was killing people so quickly, they had to bury them in mass graves?
 
In all seriousness...if it's true the fda wants to authorize a modified vaccine with zero human testing...that is troublesome...
What is the existing protocol for drugs that get modified?
Pre-Covid, was human testing mandatory for modification to an approved drug ?
 
Last edited:
There’s not evidence on a new vax that hasn’t been released, yet. Dude, that is just epically stupid.
It’s epically stupid to think there would be.
The term “new” has a pretty specific meaning.

I’ll ask what I asked Spokey: What is the existing protocol for drugs that get modified? Do they have to do human trials on a modification to an existing drug?
Look at the fda approval model...nothing got released without some form of human trials...
released, but what about modifications?
 
Last edited:
You need fda approval to use a drug (an already approved drug) off label...that approval involves clinicsl trials...so a modification would need more then mouse testing...
 
Guy with skateboard attempts to take on guy with a dressed-up rifle who has already shot someone. Where’s the logic other than “If I’m going to die, I’m going out swinging?”

Isn’t that what happened on flight 93? Isn’t that what we expect teachers to do in active shooter situations in schools? “Let’s roll”.

Now, what if the 3rd guy had dropped Rittenhouse b/c he believed he was an active shooter? Would he be supported by the same people who are supporting Kyle, or would he be called a criminal and vilified for his actions?
Genuine question.

Dude you need to read the articles/testimony that's been made public. Huber attacked Rittenhouse in a misguided attempt to avenge Rosenbaum. Huber broke loose of his girlfriend's grip as she attempted to keep him from pursuing Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse was attempting to flee the scene. Regardless of what Huber was thinking, if you clock somebody with an AR you better knock him out on the first try.

Had Huber or Grosskuertz come out on top with Rittenhouse, I wouldn't say they were guilty of anything beyond being stupid for being there. Unfortunately, Rosenbaum chose to put a match to the powder keg and others ended up paying the price for his actions.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
805,924
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top