What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I keep forgetting... you are one of "those" guys.

So because I said an opinion does not NEED to be proven or based on facts... you feel the need to ask me if I "feel" that an opinion cannot be proven wrong. Do you think that because of my statement about opinions your question is even relevant? I think it is safe to say that even a 6th grader with a C average in reading and comprehension knows that though opinions don't need to be based on facts they CAN be based on facts and if so, can be proven or disproved. They would also have the comprehensions skills to know if the person stating the opinion(s) was basing them on facts or not by the context of the conversation. A concept lost on most libertards.

If you know this, then why would you have posted earlier about how opinions should not be questioned?
And why would you be upset that I call bullshlt when someone posts something that can be contradicted by fact?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Man, the vaccines sure stopped the pandemic. I'm so glad they told us the truth and let us have our freedoms back.

Still waiting for you to explain the crazy coincidence of 90+ percent of Covid hospitalizations being unvaccinated people.

If the vaccine isn’t the common denominator, what is it? Stop withholding the info. You obviously know what it IS if you can say what it ISN’T

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If you know this, then why would you have posted earlier about how opinions should not be questioned?
And why would you be upset that I call bullshlt when someone posts something that can be contradicted by fact?

I swear to god you just make shit up don't you?

I never said opinions "should not be questioned". Again, you add your own shit and then say someone else said it. I was so clear and to the point with what I posted and you can't even get it right.

Good job posting your proof to back up your claim that Rogan gave medical advice.
Good job reading and comprehending what I posted so you wouldn't have to add your own shit.
Good job listening when I said I don't get upset over internet post.
Good job just paying attention in general.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I swear to god you just make shit up don't you?

I never said opinions "should not be questioned". Again, you add your own shit and then say someone else said it. I was so clear and to the point with what I posted and you can't even get it right.

Good job posting your proof to back up your claim that Rogan gave medical advice.
Good job reading and comprehending what I posted so you wouldn't have to add your own shit.
Good job listening when I said I don't get upset over internet post.
Good job just paying attention in general.

Can we agree these are your words and not an interpretation of something you posted?
“This boils down to these idiots basically telling everyone else that they are not allowed to have views, opinions or an opinion different from theirs. If I have an opinion and you have an opinion but neither one of us know the facts... how the **** are you going to tell me my opinion is misinformation and yours is not?”
Can we agree that you refuse to listen to the podcast Joe made? Would it not make sense that you refuse because it may prove you incorrect? Ignoring facts that contradict your opinion.
You very obviously get upset. Your post history shows it. People don’t start insulting other people unless there is negative emotion behind it. You don’t say “You’re a fvcking moron” to the cook who makes you a great porterhouse.
I pay attention just fine. YOU are the one who didn’t even recall your own post about your “home entertainment system” and thought you were insulting me when I made the reference.
Nice try.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Can we agree these are your words and not an interpretation of something you posted?
“This boils down to these idiots basically telling everyone else that they are not allowed to have views, opinions or an opinion different from theirs. If I have an opinion and you have an opinion but neither one of us know the facts... how the **** are you going to tell me my opinion is misinformation and yours is not?”
Can we agree that you refuse to listen to the podcast Joe made? Would it not make sense that you refuse because it may prove you incorrect? Ignoring facts that contradict your opinion.
You very obviously get upset. Your post history shows it. People don’t start insulting other people unless there is negative emotion behind it. You don’t say “You’re a fvcking moron” to the cook who makes you a great porterhouse.
I pay attention just fine. YOU are the one who didn’t even recall your own post about your “home entertainment system” and thought you were insulting me when I made the reference.
Nice try.

Yes, my words and it isn't even close to what you said I said.

No, we can't agree. I said post the link and time stamp. I would listen to it. You refused.

Incorrect. I am neither upset or emotional in any way to what you post. Perhaps YOU insult out of emotions, I do it because I can.

How do you know why I responded to the entertainment system? What it seems like is that you are a stalker and went way back to read my past post trying to find some ammunition to argue or insult with. I responded because it was creepy of you to bring up something so old.

Stop speaking for me... when I insult you, you will know it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yes, my words and it isn't even close to what you said I said.
Those words are saying an opinion cannot be questioned because no one knows facts (per the prior paragraph of the post).

No, we can't agree. I said post the link and time stamp. I would listen to it. You refused.
You are creating a paradox. You have never accepted any proof I have offered before, but are now complaining I will not give you a proof I cannot provide. I CANNOT listen to something on your behalf that Joe Rogan said. Nor could I watch a video on your behalf (referencing the video of the insurrection that you said was faked). Like Thomas, you will not accept a proof unless you experience it. No one can experience something on your behalf.

Incorrect. I am neither upset or emotional in any way to what you post. Perhaps YOU insult out of emotions, I do it because I can.
So you just randomly toss out insults for no other reason than to do so? Hobby, compulsion, tourettes? Have you ever done it and gotten decked in return?

How do you know why I responded to the entertainment system? What it seems like is that you are a stalker and went way back to read my past post trying to find some ammunition to argue or insult with. I responded because it was creepy of you to bring up something so old.
I simply have a good memory. I repeated your own words, and you intimated they were wrong by “correcting” me. What other reason would there be to try to correct me, than to insult me in some way?
Was it to show that you don’t even know what YOU have said?

Stop speaking for me... when I insult you, you will know it.
Quoting your words is not “speaking for you”, nor is taking your words literally. If you don’t want to be interpreted AND you don’t want to be taken literally, what is a third option that you would prefer? Ask you to tell us with every post whether to take it literally or to interpret?
Maybe you could just start with “Take this literally” and then continue.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes, my words and it isn't even close to what you said I said.
Those words are saying an opinion cannot be questioned because no one knows facts (per the prior paragraph of the post).

No, we can't agree. I said post the link and time stamp. I would listen to it. You refused.
You are creating a paradox. You have never accepted any proof I have offered before, but are now complaining I will not give you a proof I cannot provide. I CANNOT listen to something on your behalf that Joe Rogan said. Nor could I watch a video on your behalf (referencing the video of the insurrection that you said was faked).
Incorrect. I am neither upset or emotional in any way to what you post. Perhaps YOU insult out of emotions, I do it because I can.
So you just randomly toss out insults for no other reason than to do so? Hobby, compulsion, tourettes?

How do you know why I responded to the entertainment system? What it seems like is that you are a stalker and went way back to read my past post trying to find some ammunition to argue or insult with. I responded because it was creepy of you to bring up something so old.
I simply have a good memory. I repeated your own words, and you intimated they were wrong by “correcting” me. What other reason would there be to try to correct me, than to insult me in some way?
Was it to show that you don’t even know what YOU have said?

Stop speaking for me... when I insult you, you will know it.
Quoting your words is not “speaking for you”, nor is taking your words literally. If you don’t want to be interpreted AND you don’t want to be taken literally, what is a third option that you would prefer? Ask you to tell us with every post whether to take it literally or to interpret?
Maybe you could just start with “Take this literally” and then continue.

Thanks again for showing us how you think.

You can't win. You can't tell me what my context is/was when I am the person who said it.

You are correct though, I should write "take this literally" before I write because you lack basic skills that would allow you to function like a normal person.

Look at these two sentences. How are they different?

My car is silver in color.

My car is silver in color depending on the light.

They say the same thing... up to a point. After that point, things change. Do you see how and why?

 

[Jesus Christ]

....i love this thread

 

[Jesus Christ]

Oh sorry, i dont want to confuse Rob

"In my opinion".....i love this thread

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

I didn’t watch a single Joe Rogan episode until this week when this all happened. I watched a few now. I can’t actually believe anyone is freaking out. It’s nonsense. It’s almost like a bunch of sheep morons just saw it on Twitter and are acting like parrots but never actually watched any of it. One of them is probably named Rob.

Short attention span is becoming a real problem with real victims that people with an agenda take advantage of. Derek Chauvin, Kyle Rittenhouse, and George Zimmerman are great examples; very few people who strongly believe they're guilty have done enough homework to pass judgment.

 

[SlugButter]

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection

medRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by openRxiv, a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing scientific communication

www.medrxiv.org

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Thanks again for showing us how you think.

You can't win. You can't tell me what my context is/was when I am the person who said it.

You are correct though, I should write "take this literally" before I write because you lack basic skills that would allow you to function like a normal person.

Look at these two sentences. How are they different?

My car is silver in color.

My car is silver in color depending on the light.

They say the same thing... up to a point. After that point, things change. Do you see how and why?

Basically disregard everything in my response and move off on another direction.
It’s how you argue.

I know where you are trying to go with the car color, but you stated two facts. It’s the nature of color to do what you described. Nothing to argue. Had you said “My silver car turns green under a red light” then you are expressing something that does not fit the known properties of color, and it would be up to you to prove it.
Yes, you might be colorblind and see green when no one else does, but that can be verified. Know what I mean?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

http://[URL]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565v1

[/URL]

?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Basically disregard everything in my response and move off on another direction.
It’s how you argue.

I know where you are trying to go with the car color, but you stated two facts. It’s the nature of color to do what you described. Nothing to argue. Had you said “My silver car turns green under a red light” then you are expressing something that does not fit the known properties of color, and it would be up to you to prove it.
Yes, you might be colorblind and see green when no one else does, but that can be verified. Know what I mean?

See... you can't help it. You just want to argue and tell people what they meant.

 

[SlugButter]

?

?

Interesting. It won’t post for some reason and stay readable. It’s a study out of Canada that found that 3 doses of the vaccine was 93% effective against delta but is only 37% effective against omicron. I’m hoping omicron is the death of Covid, but I’m not so optimistic. Almost everyone I know has had it so they should have good immunity for quite awhile. My brother and mother are just getting over it now. Really mild symptoms.