What imports aren't ricers?

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

s2k a ricer? haha.

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

Displacement!? Its not all about cylinders.

True, its displacement not cylinders. My v6 s10 was only .3 liters smaller than my v8 mustang. 4.3 vs 4.6 So its not cylinders its displacement.

And just for the record, both were pitifully slow.

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

And on the topic of ricers, import cars can be done up nicely too.

Just the same way a muscle car can be fully restored into a beautiful classic...

or turned into a piece of redneck trash.

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

Twin turbo fox. Woohoo for poor handling drag queens.

 

[Liquid Bass 10+ year member]

And that makes it rice?
Ask a girl which car shed rather get in:

this one lol

 

[kingkong101 10+ year member]

and an STI would KILL a pontiac 400 ci motor, its not about displacement AS MUCH anymore, its about technology..

 

[kingkong101 10+ year member]

my car isn't poor handling. And the fox you pictures is an ugly gray notch.. i have a 1988 black hatchback black tinted windows 17 roh rims cobra wing.. much nicer than the s2gay

 

[ent3rdadragon 10+ year member]

I don't see why a STOCK car can be called ricer.

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

and an STI would KILL a pontiac 400 ci motor, its not about displacement AS MUCH anymore, its about technology..

Yes, it is about displacement. Turbochargers simply supplement that lack of displacement. In the end its all about consuming as much air and fuel as possible.

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

Twin turbo fox. Woohoo for poor handling drag queens.

Just like some people have 4kw on huge subs and stock front speakers, some people like going retardedly fast in a straight line and don't care about cornering.

I dig acceleration more than cornering. I get alot more opportunity to accelerate hard on the street than corner at the edge of a cars limits. Cornering at the edge of a cars limits on the street can end up very bad as well...almost had that bite me in the ass once //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[Liquid Bass 10+ year member]

i would take one of these over any of those little pop cans you guys are posting up and it isnt any more xpensive

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

i would take one of these over any of those little pop cans you guys are posting up and it isnt any more xpensive

fap fap fap fap

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

and an STI would KILL a pontiac 400 ci motor, its not about displacement AS MUCH anymore, its about technology..

forced induction 400 ci vs a 152ci forced induction...which do you think will make more hp...and tq.

Head and valve train technology help, but if your talking about both forced induction...more cubes will win out. The STI would have to make over 2.6 times the hp/ci to keep up.

 

[solidcrowd 10+ year member]

what about some trucks on the quarter mile, anyone have any moded ones or know of any that can get in the 11-12 second range or faster?

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

what about some trucks on the quarter mile, anyone have any moded ones or know of any that can get in the 11-12 second range or faster?

If your talking about diesel trucks, that quite possibly could be considered the new rice type craze.

 

[kingkong101 10+ year member]

your wrong eugenics that does not equal displacement... Thats like saying if i put a 460 ford in my fox body i am going to beat an sti.. which i wont.. its not all about displacement, its not really about how much fuel and air either, a lot of you have not a clue. Suspension, tires, vehicle weight (which is why the gto you posted can barely outrun a stock 4.6) parasitic loss.. like the ls1 camaro is an awesome small block 350, that has heads made by god himself from the factory, and just with a cam and intake manifold and belt over 450 horses to the fly.. a 460 ford cant do that. Its not about displacement anymore. in the 60's 70's company's had 0 technology which is why they figured the bigger the motor the faster, but seriously now big motors are just heavy...

 

[alxmlr789 10+ year member]

what about some trucks on the quarter mile, anyone have any moded ones or know of any that can get in the 11-12 second range or faster?

my truck is slow. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif lol

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

your wrong eugenics that does not equal displacement... Thats like saying if i put a 460 ford in my fox body i am going to beat an sti.. which i wont.. its not all about displacement, its not really about how much fuel and air either, a lot of you have not a clue. Suspension, tires, vehicle weight (which is why the gto you posted can barely outrun a stock 4.6) parasitic loss.. like the ls1 camaro is an awesome small block 350, that has heads made by god himself from the factory, and just with a cam and intake manifold and belt over 450 horses to the fly.. a 460 ford cant do that. Its not about displacement anymore. in the 60's 70's company's had 0 technology which is why they figured the bigger the motor the faster, but seriously now big motors are just heavy...

I dont know where to begin. Cut our losses and and get someone to dictate your ramblings for us, please. You're illiterate, and dont know what you're talking about.

 

[kingkong101 10+ year member]

solid, trucks are actually doing very well with diesel mods, and with under 1000 most ford, chevy, dodge, trucks are getting into the 12's. The 11's is another story but its not TOO much of a difficult feat.

 

[kingkong101 10+ year member]

lol i know what im talking about ive only been building motors since i was 9 and im 17.. boces for auto mechanics.. 5 years of auto technician class.