Vote Ron Paul 2012

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

It was more like the Bush Administration.

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

Are you fucking serious.

Damn right I'm serious, The Reagan admin set the ground that made everyone think that deficit spending was ok. The Bush administration surely didn't help things at all. The Clinton administration not only balanced the budget, it wiped out the huge deficit created by the previous administrations (Reagan & Bush Sr.) and created a spending surplus that was pissed away as soon as Bush Jr took the reigns. Now fuck off and go back under your bridge you worthless troll.

 

[gunz4me2 10+ year member]

dont really matter who u vote for cuz peoples vote is like 13 percent of actual voting electoral votes from each state determine the winner

What gets me is the people who do NOT understand the electoral college and the relationship to the presidential election. Did they stop teaching this in school or something?

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

And that administration gave nuclear bombs to China and crashed the housing market. And a deficit is your primary concern!?!?!?
Keep the liberal trolls up, faggot. I'll be here to smack you at every step.

hey bro, Clinton started the ball rolling with a lot more than nukes going to China.

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

And that administration gave nuclear bombs to China and crashed the housing market. And a deficit is your primary concern!?!?!?
Keep the liberal trolls up, faggot. I'll be here to smack you at every step.

Clinton didn't give or sell anything to anybody. His adminstration loosened restrictions on technology exports, and a few things got out that probably should not have.

A republican congress conducted a full investigation and found that while some information was passed to the Chinese by Loral, it didn't amount to much. The CIA, in fact, said that Loral hadn't given the Chinese much useful information, and even the Air Force said that the material given to the Chinese by Loral had increased their capabilities only incrementally. Its more likely that Loral employees acted incompetently in exceeding the scope of their export license. You canb't blame Clinton for that.

President Bush in 2002 stated that high down payments are a big barrier to first time owners. During the "A Home Of Your Own" conference on May of 2002 President Bush urged Congress to use taxpayers money to interfere in the market place by lowering down payments for those that cannot afford to buy a home. During that speech President Bush also explained how the guarantees of home loans by the Government Sponsored Enterprises would streamline the underwriting process and basically neglect the risk variable. President Bush made it clear that his and Congress’ vision is to make homeownership a right and not a privilege. This type of market interference in addition to the Federal Reserve manipulating short term rates to historic lows greatly increased the demand for housing and extended cheap credit to people that otherwise wouldn’t have qualified. It wasn’t the free market that encouraged malinvestment and led to financially flawed business decisions. It was a continuation and expansion of big government policies, brought to us by both Democrats and Republicans.

Now how about you take that finger you're trying to point at something with and point it directly up your ass and spin around on it.

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

Clinton didn't give or sell anything to anybody. His adminstration loosened restrictions on technology exports, and a few things got out that probably should not have.
A republican congress conducted a full investigation and found that while some information was passed to the Chinese by Loral, it didn't amount to much. The CIA, in fact, said that Loral hadn't given the Chinese much useful information, and even the Air Force said that the material given to the Chinese by Loral had increased their capabilities only incrementally. Its more likely that LORAL employees acted incompetently in exceeding the scope of their export license. You canb't blame Clinton for that.

President Bush in 2002 stated that high down payments are a big barrier to first time owners. During A Home Of Your Own conference on May 17, 2002 President Bush urged Congress to use taxpayers money to interfere in the market place by lowering down payments for those that cannot afford to buy a home. During that speech President Bush also explained how the guarantees of home loans by the Government Sponsored Enterprises would streamline the underwriting process and basically neglect the risk variable. President Bush made it clear that his and Congress’ vision is to make homeownership a right and not a privilege. This type of market interference in addition to the Federal Reserve manipulating short term rates to historic lows greatly increased the demand for housing and extended cheap credit to people that otherwise wouldn’t have qualified. It wasn’t the free market that encouraged malinvestment and led to financially flawed business decisions. It was a continuation and expansion of big government policies, brought to us by both Democrats and Republicans.

Now how about you take that finger you're trying to point at something and point it directly up your ass and spin around on it.

Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama...all driven by da Banksters, bro...it's all in da Banksters.

 

[05350z]

Ron Paul ftw only candidate not funded by the big bankers. were all fucked anyway zombies soon //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/2thumbs.gif.fdc3ba010dbb42b61704534b46d02fe4.gif

 

[DoesDad 10+ year member]

If you vote for Paul you're voting for Obama. It's as simple as that. You want 4 more years of this shlt knock yourself out.

Black unemployment is at 15% and black teenage unemployment is at 40%. Yet he'll still get 98% of the black vote. Should tell you something. Saw a black woman at the NAACP thing when Romney was there saying she made 17k a year. How was she supposed to support her children or buy health insurance for her children? Or feed HER CHILDREN?! How about NOT having children and being responsible for yourself and not living off the taxpayers ***. I guess that involves too much personal responsibility.

I'll be holding my nose and voting for Romney and hoping against hope that things will change. Because if I have to watch this smug, arrogant POS walk around on stage and tell me that rich people need to pay their fair share and how great Obamacare is I'm going to go puke.

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

If you vote for Paul you're voting for Obama. It's as simple as that. You want 4 more years of this shlt knock yourself out.
Black unemployment is at 15% and black teenage unemployment is at 40%. Yet he'll still get 98% of the black vote. Should tell you something. Saw a black woman at the NAACP thing when Romney was there saying she made 17k a year. How was she supposed to support her children or buy health insurance for her children? Or feed HER CHILDREN?! How about NOT having children and being responsible for yourself and not living off the taxpayers ***. I guess that involves too much personal responsibility.

I'll be holding my nose and voting for Romney and hoping against hope that things will change. Because if I have to watch this smug, arrogant POS walk around on stage and tell me that rich people need to pay their fair share and how great Obamacare is I'm going to go puke.

Until there is a flat tax, rich people will NEVER pair their fair share. And jesus christ is this forum full of nothing but conservatives? Where are the educated liberals at?

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

I'm hoping for a zombie apocolypse. Only way anything will change in this country //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

@SpiderMonkey ; I don't see you trying to post factual examples and I only see name calling but you are unable to post any sort of fact or example. I've said all I need to say here, its a lost cause.