Unconstitutional

Your double talk gets old. You've admitted you think conservatism is a positive in terms of being a balancing force to radical liberalism, yet you cite not one single conservative stance, or individual, as being a positive influence on society. Its clear you either said conservatism is a good balancing force simply because you didnt want to seem as radical as you really are (lying), or this topic is simply above your head and you lose track of which side you are on from day to day. Insincerity, os stupidity, take your pick. Personally, I think they are both fitting.
It's clear you can't comprehend the difference between a balancing force and the actual policy of the conservatives.

You fall back on this point repeatedly, even though I shoot it down every single time. At one time in history, slavery was globally accepted, I guess that makes it morally correct too, right?
No, it doesn't. But that has nothing to do with what I said. Slavery didn't move from the center to the social right. It was always in the social right.

 
Ah, so economically you agree with an extreme conservative? You are pro corporatism? Pro isolationist? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif Do you even have a fucking clue what you are talking about? lulz
You realize someone can be a social conservative while being an economic liberal, right?

 
Not necessarily. It's way more complex than that. Just like it's way more complex that "dur I can't decide between both sides so I'll just say the truth is in the middle and sound educated and rational".
I mean, if one group says the earth as round and the other says the earth is flat, is the truth in the middle? Are the ones that say the earth is round and the other side is stupid because they think it's flat close minded?
You just argue to hear yourself talk. Seriously. YOU take a centrist position in relation to the absolute extremes too, moron. Unless you believe in pure communism, or fascism, you take a position somewhere 'in the middle' too. Are you here advocating pure communism or fascism?

 
You just argue to hear yourself talk. Seriously. YOU take a centrist position in relation to the absolute extremes too, moron. Unless you believe in pure communism, or fascism, you take a position somewhere 'in the middle' too. Are you here advocating pure communism or fascism?
I take a middle position not because I think that the truth just MUST be in the middle, not matter the arguments on either side. I researched the facts myself, formed my beliefs of logic and evidence, and I ended up in the center, globally. I'm on the left in American mainstream politics.

 
It's clear you can't comprehend the difference between a balancing force and the actual policy of the conservatives.


No, it doesn't. But that has nothing to do with what I said. Slavery didn't move from the center to the social right. It was always in the social right.
Good call Prox, conservatism is a positive balancing force, but not one single conservative stance is positive. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

How is/was slavery a socially conservative stance? This should be amusing...

Aside from the social political stance of slavery, you dodged my point (big surprise). You imply your political stance is morally and socially correct because its globally accepted, yet when I remind you that slavery was once globally accepted, you try to spin the point by stating slavery was socially conservative. You must think we are stupid if you think we will miss your obvious attempts to alter the discussion to suit your agenda. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 
I just got an A in my Pol Sci class. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/thumbsup.gif.3287b36ca96645a13a43aff531f37f02.gif
I guess that makes you an expert, right? But when I mention you've yet to take an economics class, you dismiss it as not relevant to your knowledge. Funny how your stance twists to suit you, huh? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 
I take a middle position not because I think that the truth just MUST be in the middle, not matter the arguments on either side. I researched the facts myself, formed my beliefs of logic and evidence, and I ended up in the center, globally. I'm on the left in American mainstream politics.
Im glad you feel vindicated because people in France agree with you. But that does not remove the fact that you assume someone taking a more conservative stance than you must be wrong based on popularity world wide, nor that RAM is assuming the truth "just MUST be in the middle". Besides, I thought you agreed with Hitler fiscally, which put you at the far right end of the spectrum. I guess that poly sci class forgot to talk about fascism.

 
Good call Prox, conservatism is a positive balancing force, but not one single conservative stance is positive. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif
Pretty much.

How is/was slavery a socially conservative stance? This should be amusing...
The more socially conservative you are, the more you want government involvement in social issues. To put it another way, social conservatives want less social freedom, social liberals want more social freedom. Slavery, domination of a perceived lesser race, was very socially conservative.

You imply your political stance is morally and socially correct because its globally accepted
I've implied nothing of the sort. Just because it's in the center of the political spectrum doesn't mean that it's automatically globally accepted. If everybody in the world wanted pure socialism, socialism would still be on the left, not the center.

 
I guess that makes you an expert, right? But when I mention you've yet to take an economics class, you dismiss it as not relevant to your knowledge. Funny how your stance twists to suit you, huh? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif
The A in my class thing was just a joke, it wasn't meant to mean or imply anything. If it did to you, I apologize and rescind the statement. In fact, I'll even just tell you I was lying, I failed it miserably.

But that does not remove the fact that you assume someone taking a more conservative stance than you must be wrong based on popularity world wide
No, again, you're confusing center with global position. It's not the center because most people agree with whatever views it holds, it's because it's in between pure socialism and pure capitalism, speaking economically.

Besides, I thought you agreed with Hitler fiscally, which put you at the far right end of the spectrum. I guess that poly sci class forgot to talk about fascism.
LOL, no it doesn't you fool. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif Hitler was middle left. Go read up on his economic policies.

 
Wow, this is fun. I'm surprised I waited out so long on the action. Prox is just that easy to rile up! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
How do you keep a Proximity busy all day? Put him in a round room, and tell him to pee in a corner.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

AlterEgo99

5,000+ posts
Streaming consciousness
Thread starter
AlterEgo99
Joined
Location
Domie Homie
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
660
Views
7,101
Last reply date
Last reply from
audiolife
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top