I never said the truth is in the middle of the global political spectrum. Try again bro, you're still twisting. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gifNo, it's not hard for me to accept at all. I'm just telling you that I'm actually in the middle, objectively. So by you saying that the truth is always in the middle, that means you agree with me. So again, thank you.
Says who? Your assumptions? I forgot that your gut is full of 100% fact and is also infallible.LOL, 10 minutes ago you didn't even know the difference.
No bro, it's not. Trickle down is either good for the average person, or it isn't. History shows it isn't. People may have different beliefs between uneducated people, but there is one truth.Still an opinion, sorry bro.
Said you. When I said that democrats are in the center, you called me delusional. If you knew what I was saying was true (and it is), then you wouldn't have called me delusional.Says who? Your assumptions? I forgot that your gut is full of 100% fact and is also infallible.
You said nothing about people, you said good for the country. I'm thinking big picture here, broski.No bro, it's not. Trickle down is either good for the average person, or it isn't. History shows it isn't. People may have different beliefs between uneducated people, but there is one truth.
I forgive you, don't worry.Said you. When I said that democrats are in the center, you called me delusional. If you knew what I was saying was true (and it is), then you wouldn't have called me delusional.
Your double talk gets old. You've admitted you think conservatism is a positive in terms of being a balancing force to radical liberalism, yet you cite not one single conservative stance, or individual, as being a positive influence on society. Its clear you either said conservatism is a good balancing force simply because you didnt want to seem as radical as you really are (lying), or this topic is simply above your head and you lose track of which side you are on from day to day. Insincerity, os stupidity, take your pick. Personally, I think they are both fitting.That is the bullshit that I hate. Truth isn't an average of two subjective arguments. You just take two viewpoints and because you don't want to take the effort (like I have) to determine the objective truth, you just take the easy way out and say the truth must be in the middle.
You fall back on this point repeatedly, even though I shoot it down every single time. At one time in history, slavery was globally accepted, I guess that makes it morally correct too, right?But, since I'm sure you're so attuned to your both sides have equal weight theory, let me tell you this. Speaking from a global perspective, we don't have the left and right in this country. We have the center (democrats) and the right. I, believe it or not, am in the center.
Why you gotta ruin my fun with this seriousness, bruh? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifYour double talk gets old. You've admitted you think conservatism is a positive in terms of being a balancing force to radical liberalism, yet you cite not one single conservative stance, or individual, as being a positive influence on society. Its clear you either said conservatism is a good balancing force simply because you didnt want to seem as radical as you really are (lying), or this topic is simply above your head and you lose track of which side you are on from day to day. Insincerity, os stupidity, take your pick. Personally, I think they are both fitting.
There's a lot more than just making X amount of people happy.What is a country without the people that live in it? Did you think I meant good for the mountains?