Unconstitutional

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

audioholic insults me for being too much of a Democrat sheep because I'm too biased in terms of policy. The problem isn't people being too biased or opinionated about policy, it's people not seeing past the bullshit politics of both parties and realizing that one party's policy is good for the average person and one isn't. They just see that both play a beyond ****** political game and think, because they're the same politically, that they're both the same in terms of policy in terms of net result for them, and it's completely false.

You're always going to be a little picture kind of guy, aren't you Prox? Taxing the top 1% richest people 99% of their wages would be 'good for the average guy', but that wouldn't make it right. Socialism is good for the average guy, but that doesn't make it right. Social programs for minorities isn't good for the average person, does that make them wrong? I didnt think so.

Its too bad you dont think as much as you talk.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

but that wouldn't make it right.

Then that is where we disagree.

(Although you're using an extreme example, obviously 99% percent of all wages wouldn't be "right", but 90% of all income over a million dollars? **** yes)

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

Then that is where we disagree.
(Although you're using an extreme example, obviously 99% percent of all wages wouldn't be "right", but 90% of all income over a million dollars? **** yes)

Show us all where your Marxist crony socialistic ideas have worked for more than 40 years and where it doesn't end up looking like Cuba, North Korea or China eventually.....Even your precious France is falling apart. Ends to a means is how you measure the success of an ideology and the ends to the means in this is everyone in the poor house depending on government rather than people having control of their own lives. The more Authoritarian the better eh?

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

You mean means to an end? God you are an idiot.

High tax rates on the rich have benefited this country from about 1932 to 1981. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Socialism is this country is continuing to benefit us as we speak.

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

Lets see asshat from 1932 to 1945 the economy ****** and even when it grew it still ****** under those conditions. 1978-1983 ****** due directly to your "policies" the resurrection time was from tearing out the base of wasteful spending and too big of government. In Bill Clinton's "economy" any idiot short of Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez could have done as well and if he was the almighty great business man why was there the dot com bubble popping? When did sub prime lending start? Who fought tooth and nail to stop policing sub prime loans?

Who championd the idea that home ownership was a right and who now seems to be against private property rights? Why didn't Clinton go full bore after terrorists prior to 9/11? Had he done so do you think Bush might have too? Lets just forget that the problems before 1932 were also caused by the Federal Reserve which was embraced by another socialistic racist asshat named Woodrow Wilson.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

How is 9/11 even remotely relevant to what we're talking about? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif You really just to rant about anything that pops into your head, don't you? It's like a spitting contest with you. You can't hold a subject for more than 1/2 of a post, so to try and "win", you bring up completely unrelated bullshit. "Oh, you think that Democrats are better for the economy?!?!?!?! Well, clinton caused 9/11! HAH! I win! Crony! Marxist! Adfaskdfhasdkljfs!"

Yeah, in the 30s there was the great depression which was caused by conservatives. However, due to Franklin the Great, our country saw a lot of growth and probably the highest GDP rate of growth we've ever seen. Your babble about 78-83 is incomprehensible due to your inability to speak English.

And even audioholic just admitted that my "Marxist crony socialistic ideas" were beneficial, just not "right" (quite the change of tune, I might add). Seriously, just stop posting here, you aren't smart enough.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

And just out of curiosity audiolife, what is "your position" on Mr. Assange?

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

How is 9/11 even remotely relevant to what we're talking about? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif You really just to rant about anything that pops into your head, don't you? It's like a spitting contest with you. You can't hold a subject for more than 1/2 of a post, so to try and "win", you bring up completely unrelated bullshit.9/11 had no effects on the economy? Really? So acts of war and the destruction of the one of the largest business areas in the entire world has no economic effects?

Yeah, in the 30s there was the great depression which was caused by conservatives. However, due to Franklin the Great, our country saw a lot of growth and probably the highest GDP rate of growth we've ever seen. Your babble about 78-83 is incomprehensible due to your inability to speak English.

It was from a bubble the federal reserve created. Are you trying to say you do not know history before your birth? People didn't stand in line 4 hours to get 5 bucks in gas? If you are batting 0-100 and you get a hit that is rapid growth to your batting average as well.

And even audioholic just admitted that my "Marxist crony socialistic ideas" were beneficial, just not "right" (quite the change of tune, I might add). Seriously, just stop posting here, you aren't smart enough.

Im not audioholic and if you read that deep into what he was saying you are missing half of the points he made against your ideas to your religion to begin with.

*** owned so now you are going to cry? Woodrow Wilson started segregation to "fix" a made up problem so later on some one could come along and claim they fixed an atrocity caused by a liked minded person. In this case that someone was 100% against Civil Rights 8 years prior because it didn't allow the government to skull **** businesses by means outside of what the bill was ever intended to do in the first place.

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

And just out of curiosity audiolife, what is "your position" on Mr. Assange?

Criminal charges brought against the leakers and just his site taken down...then again much of what gets revealed also shows the wonder land most liberals live in.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

Criminal charges brought against the leakers and just his site taken down...then again much of what gets revealed also shows the wonder land most liberals live in.

Right, that is what happened. Do you like him or not? Do you think what he did was good or not.

 

[AlterEgo99 5,000+ posts]

Traitor...should be shot. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/boink.gif.91933e72f927f2cefc79aff02573090c.gif

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

Right, that is what happened. Do you like him or not? Do you think what he did was good or not.

Think it is pointless.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Then that is where we disagree.
(Although you're using an extreme example, obviously 99% percent of all wages wouldn't be "right", but 90% of all income over a million dollars? **** yes)

90% is an extreme example.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

90% is an extreme example.

Yet we had a top tax rate of over 90% for 15 years. And either over or almost 80% for 27 years.