audioholic
5,000+ posts
not a moderator
Uh, slavery and 90% taxes on the rich are comparable, in exactly the manner I compared them: as policy our govt once considered fair, legal, and moral. The fact you keep returning to your thought that slavery is far worse than 90% tax rates simply shows you are incapable of keeping the conversation on point. Why? Because its vastly easier to simply say "slavery is worse than my tax rate suggestion!!!111oneone11!!" than it is to admit my point is valid (previously accepted mores do not dictate moral fairness).Believe it or not, a point can be understood though not agreed with. I understand the point you're making, but it's bullshit. Even though our government allowed it, Slavery was an obviously horrible practice. Taxing the rich is nowhere near as horrible as slavery (and I'm obviously arguing that it isn't bad at all). Thus, your comparison is invalid. I know what you're trying to say, but slavery and taxing the rich are nowhere near comparable. Sorry.
I really wish you were as smart as you think you are. Then maybe our conversations would go somewhere other than the circles your logic, and inability to decipher my logic, take us in.
