newusername
10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
That is akin to ranking the plot of a novel as more integral than the theme. I don't think it's the story that means anything...it is the intended lesson or knowledge given through it's occurrence. I will grant that the challenge presented is the ability to discern meaning is limited amongst most (and more limited as time passes).Look at many of the accounts in the Bible (for example) which are integral parts of the story/myth/legend/religion. They are hardly what would be considered stories of good "morals". Many of them include genocide, discrimination, murder, ****, etc.
For many, their religious beliefs are the driving factor in all decisions they make. But let's take that supposition further for a moment....even if only one person on this planet has good morals because of religion, is that not a good thing?Can they provide a good moral compass ? Yes, if you ignore large parts of the story and pick-and-choose which parts you wish to follow in order to obtain your morals. But you don't need religion to have good morals. If the only reason you have good morals is because of your religious beliefs....that's a scary thought indeed. Lets hope an individual never loses those beliefs if they need them to act morally //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
It can be demonstrated that religion is not necessary for good moral and altruistic actions. So to tout that as a benefit of religion I think is a bit cockeyed.
I've never read much philosophical work from Feynman...don't know much beyond his famous lectures. Maybe I need to be reading more.The meaning to my life is loving those who I hold dear and raising my children to the best of my abilities. I don't need a meaning beyond that.
As Richard Feynman said (not a direct quote, but the essence is intact); I'm okay with not having all of the answers. I live my life happily (for the most part //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif ) by attributing meaning to life from those things that mean the most in my life.
Read more Richard Feynman //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
And therein lies my mental conundrum. I, without religion, question carrying on life every morning I wake up. I find my life is unimportant and without value. And thus I do not question any person who gains fulfillment through religion.I guess I would disagree.
On an individual level, the value and purpose to my life is in my ability to love and to share. To pass knowledge and experience on to future generations so that they too can enjoy life.
In the grand scheme of things we are only as important as the [likely] hundreds of millions of other planets with living organisms on them.
I think the approach is different, but I agree it goes both ways. That's why I'm Agnostic. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifStatistically it's true ! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
But on a more serious note, it goes both ways. Theists believe (no pun intended) they have something up on atheists. Hell, they believe they have something up on theists of a different deity.

