Yeah, you could do some very retarded things if you take this guy's approach.I was being sarcastic.
I am sure whites experience a variety of statistics in far greater numbers than blacks. You are wanting to compare apples to oranges, and you cannot compare it that way. Running the numbers straight doesn't work here.
By that rationale, you can call blacks, asians, hispanics, etc all poor as shit because the wealth of those races pale in comparison to whites. WHy? because there are more whites. On a per capita basis, whites aren't all that wealthy. Blacks are still poor.
There is a button called "QUOTE" under each post. Click that instead of copy and pasting."can someone start saving this thread? PLEASE"
how do you save complete fail?
No, my motivation was for no fingers to be pointed. Whites commit just as many crimes as blacks. End of case. Saying blacks are criminals by nature is racist.To be honest it appears that your motivation behind this thread was to "point the finger the other way", you appear to be the racist here //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
More whites than blacks, so more whites buy watermelons? Is that a fail?Yeah, you could do some very retarded things if you take this guy's approach.
More white people than blacks, so blacks are immortal.
More white people than blacks have diabities, so teh sugars is not really a problem among blacks.
I was going to go with sycle cell anemia, but wasn't sure if I could prove it quickly.Yeah, you could do some very retarded things if you take this guy's approach.
More white people than blacks die, so blacks are immortal.
More white people than blacks have diabities, so teh sugars is not really a problem among blacks.
I wouldn't mess with Flip.Compare the number in the first column to the total amount of white people.Compare the number in the second column to the total amount of black people.
Which is why I said, on a proportional basis.