i would not take a FI Q 15 over a Mag 15. Mag better for SPL and Mag better for SQ. However i will probably try to get my friend to buy some ssd's, if he does his spl set up.Love both companiesim happy to see the FIQ 12 got a good review. for a $250 sub it did real good compared with subs that are $450, $500 or more. I like the FIQ more and more now. Its a great sub with a good price.
I just have one Q, how come there was no IDMAX in the test?
Ported SPL: FIQ did better than a MAG and it almost half the price lol, that was funny.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif
LOL i realy like the FIQ now
BTW, great job on the review.
So you've dealt with both hands on eh?i would not take a FI Q 15 over a Mag 15. Mag better for SPL and Mag better for SQ. However i will probably try to get my friend to buy some ssd's, if he does his spl set up.Love both companies
type r will be tested.. it didnt show up in time b/c of a crappy ebay sellerwhy is it some of the subs off the original list were not tested, i wanted to see the type R
funny, i don't see me saying that i've have. I just prefer the looks of the Mag over the Q, and would not take a Q over a Mag just because of the test.(which had the Mag hit higher for spl burp and rank higher for SQ comparisson). I was actually just posting that to bug the guy who said q did better than the Mag at half the price. I'm sure they're great subs and the price is right, however this is a fun sport for most who just want to hear bass. I didn't recommend anyone else take Mag's over Q's, i said that was my opinion, so relax. And for the record i never recommend any subs over another that i've never heard or had hands on dealings with. Just to let you know, i had my first Mag since 2005 and wanted one when i had my e15a. Just wanted to let you know i didn't buy this sub because of forum boner but due to research for years of SI and their products.kthnxbyeSo you've dealt with both hands on eh?
nG
any subs you may consider switching the Mags out for? ****, after all the subs you listened to and tested it wouldn't surprise me. Great test and we respect the time it took you as well. i'm jsut taking the results with a grain of salt and people must realize that every ccar is different and subs perform different in different environments as well. Good to see we have some sort of reference for subs though. again thanks for the time and effort put into these test. Can only imagine how many times you may have thought about not doing it due to people pm'ng you and probably non stop harrassing youSome woofers that were promised.. did not show up....
we tested what we got.. and that's all we can do..
the Type R is on the way now.. and we'll be tested..
the Napalm will be tested as well..
Loyd L.
funny, i don't see me saying that i've have. I just prefer the looks of the Mag over the Q, and would not take a Q over a Mag just because of the test.(which had the Mag hit higher for spl burp and rank higher for SQ comparisson). I was actually just posting that to bug the guy who said q did better than the Mag at half the price. I'm sure they're great subs and the price is right, however this is a fun sport for most who just want to hear bass. I didn't recommend anyone else take Mag's over Q's, i said that was my opinion, so relax. And for the record i never recommend any subs over another that i've never heard or had hands on dealings with. Just to let you know, i had my first Mag since 2005 and wanted one when i had my e15a. Just wanted to let you know i didn't buy this sub because of forum boner but due to research for years of SI and their products.kthnxbye![]()
you'll have to explain that one to me later..loyd that was a biased comment u made
80
its simpleyou'll have to explain that one to me later..
Loyd L.