T2 Vs Aq

[johnnyvolcom5 10+ year member]

Hey guys, my buddy wants whats to buy a new ten for his car. He wants to get the T2, but i suggested he try one of the AQ HD lines. What do you guys think? He is concerned that he cannot hear the AQ before he buys it, but it is considerably cheaper then a T2.

Any input would be great!

Click to read more...

 

[chase007 10+ year member]

haha johnny where you at in mn???

 

[johnnyvolcom5 10+ year member]

haha johnny where you at in mn???

around plymouth! ur from minnetonka huh? i work out of excelsior all summer for a tree trimming company!

 

[350zspl 10+ year member]

aq>t2

 

[chase007 10+ year member]

around plymouth! ur from minnetonka huh? i work out of excelsior all summer for a tree trimming company!

I'm 30 mins south from kato, let me know if ur buddy needs a box i'l make you one pretty cheap

 

[brucebruce1546 10+ year member]

T2 is a very over priced woofer for the output imho, the aq will own it in performance and price. I have seen more blown t2s in my time than i can shake a stick at. Not being biased just giving a honest opinion, I would always reccomend AQ, but even if you didnt go that route I would steer clear of the T2!

 

[taintedplay 10+ year member]

ok chase007, just becuase you have a q6600 (i do as well) does not mean you multiply the core clock times teh cores. IE you DONT have 16ghz cpu. it doesent work that way. You have a 4ghz quad. sorry to thread jack, just had to point that out

 

[MasterOfAllBass 10+ year member]

around plymouth! ur from minnetonka huh? i work out of excelsior all summer for a tree trimming company!

i run aq also and im in st.cloud mn. get the aqs

 

[MasterOfAllBass 10+ year member]

ok chase007, just becuase you have a q6600 (i do as well) does not mean you multiply the core clock times teh cores. IE you DONT have 16ghz cpu. it doesent work that way. You have a 4ghz quad. sorry to thread jack, just had to point that out

your retared, i build computers, each core is runing @ 4ghz

at stock clock its 2.4ghz PER CORE for Q6600 Kentsfield

 

[johnnyvolcom5 10+ year member]

can we please stick to the thread!!! I think AQ>T2 but my buddy is ignorant and wants to HEAR the sub first....Ignorance!

 

[chase007 10+ year member]

your retared, i build computers, each core is runing @ 4ghz at stock clock its 2.4ghz PER CORE for Q6600 Kentsfield

No sh*t let me see 4.0 core clock x 4 =16 well a normal person would be like 16 wow thats fast hes using a quad core so 16 / 4 = 4.0 per core...good job mate we all know how to divide and multiply

 

[johnnyvolcom5 10+ year member]

No sh*t let me see 4.0 core clock x 4 =16 well a normal person would be like 16 wow thats fast hes using a quad core so 16 / 4 = 4.0 per core...good job mate we all know how to divide and multiply

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif thread!!!!!!

 

[chase007 10+ year member]

Sorry lol aq> t2 but t2 is cheaper then aq

you tube is a good way to here subs

 

[Plutoman 10+ year member]

AQ > T2. End of story. No question about it. Imo.

 

[chase007 10+ year member]

let ur buddy find out the hard way if he likes t2 that much...its his $$