supply and demand question

No it's not ... The demand for fuel has increased significantly over the past 10 years and OPEC hasn't raised its output at the same rate as the increase in demand. If the rise in demand exceeds the rise in supply, the price goes up. It's a pretty simple concept.
As for England's gas, they use a different octane rating system. 95 octane fuel in England is 87 octane fuel in North America. See http://www.btinternet.com/~madmole/Reference/RONMONPON.html for more info.

England's fuel prices are high because of taxes.

Read the chart again US uses PON while Eng uses RON 95=91

But you are correct buy saying they have higher taxes, but they also get more for their tax dollars then we do, like fee health care, better schools and such

 
Gas prices will decrease if supply and demand work inversely to eachother.

Just because supply increase does not mean prices will lower, just as a decrease in demand will lower prices. In Economics 101 it works this way, but not in Economics Reality.

For the price to lower, supply has to increase and demand must stay constant or decrease, creating excess supply. To simply make oil refining more effective will not work. If supply rose such that price reduced to $1.00 per gallon, our demand would increase to bid the price back up UNLESS they were so **** good the refineries could outpace any possible increase in demand. We must pair effeciencies, competition, etc with entrants, regulations, etc.

What you should try to explain that on it's own increasing supply or decreasing demand won't work. They tend to work in parity with each other until the point where the marginal value is zero. (Even if gas was .25, how much more would you really buy...me maybe 10 more gallons a month)

Demand for fuel is rather inelastic (How much does price affect the qty you buy), but increasing supply can be done a number of ways....

Remember, what we are actually demanding is a substance to make our cars move. We do not actually demand gasoline. It is merely a cheap way to achieve that goal.

1st we must create incentives to create alternatives. Because of various statutes, the American government can directly compete with private industry. But we can give tax breaks. Some call it corporate welfare but we create economic incentives all the time to acheive social policy.

Just as we auctioned off sulfer contracts, we can auction off fuel effeciency stanards.

 
I didn't want to get cut off....

2nd we must get acceptance of the American people to understand all the things we use oil for

Such as lubricants, plastics, many synthetics, paints, cleaners, stains, etc. Simply buying fuel effecient cars is not enough. We must reduce TOTAL demand, meaning all possible uses for oil.

---------------

In short, it would be quite stupid to think we can decrease our demand for energy. We require it at an ever accelerating pace. What we can do is chose a better way to aquire it. But until the incentives are there to harness lighting, isolate and stablize hydrogen cheaply, there is nothing we can really do.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

hello again

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
hello again
Joined
Location
home
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
39
Views
516
Last reply date
Last reply from
Flipx99
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top