sub/port direction

I have same truck almost. Past few years I have had my subs facing back with port up. Many different number and size subs. It hits very hard. I removed my rear carpet on back of cab, deadened the wall very good, covered whole wall with a piece of MDF then reinstalled my carpet. My thinking was to give the sub a nice wall to load off of.

With my ultras and pair of 2ks strapped it was very brutal very close to too painful.

I am now in the process of revamping system and thinking of going with a larger port and bigger box. SUB UP PORT UP.

 
I have same truck almost. Past few years I have had my subs facing back with port up. Many different number and size subs. It hits very hard. I removed my rear carpet on back of cab, deadened the wall very good, covered whole wall with a piece of MDF then reinstalled my carpet. My thinking was to give the sub a nice wall to load off of. With my ultras and pair of 2ks strapped it was very brutal very close to too painful.

I am now in the process of revamping system and thinking of going with a larger port and bigger box. SUB UP PORT UP.
The increase in sound was from you deadening and getting rid of some flex. The port is what needs to be loaded not the sub. Most of the sound comes from port in a ported box. Well pressure I guess that's the best way I can explain it.

 
Sounds like it would technically be better bouncing off the rear wall. My issue is its really choking out the port. There isn't much room back there for it to breath. I'm wanting to move more air for better hairtricks.

 
My current box is now subs up, port up. 13 cube after all displacement tuned to 32 hz with 180 inches of port. This sounds the best for me thus far. I do have my whole truck deadened good. At full tilt on heavy bass songs I can start to hear my roof which I don't like.

 
Did port forward. Got way more windshield flex, visor flex and the high notes don't **** power now. But now the lows aren't as good and the lows **** power.. But it sounds better. Not sure if I like it or not

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

thanks DB, that definitely helps swallowing a $300 price tag 😂 these would essentially be running midbass for me too
12
243
What is your budget? With being exposed to Rain.. I would recommend looking at a marine grade SAS Bazooka for the sub stage
3
383
Don't forget Hoffman's Iron Law. You can have 2 of the 3: low end, efficiency/sensitivity or small enclosure size...
4
493
In that airspace you could go ported with th Si SQL 12@$369, hands down the best option in a 1.41 ported box. With 1000 watts RMS and 92 db...
16
814
One or two, they are still subwoofer outs and are mono summed signals from both left and right. Even the 2 RCA subwoofer pre-outs on the 2nd one...
3
526

About this thread

Thread starter
sanguine79
Joined
Location
Carthage, NC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
12
Views
772
Last reply date
Last reply from
sanguine79
1000007975.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 16, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
1000007974.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 16, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top