i sense some butthurt, here,... gettin all up in them feelings, typos, and defensiveness.
i guess you don't know what an inference is either, with my linking to nasa. fuggin' facepalm*
you got one thing right though... calling me a clown couldn't be further from the truth as i relish in the fact that you and your ilk make it just that easy to be so. mmfwcl mofakoo!
if you didn't notice, this is the THUNDERDOME, freud, anything goes and staying on topic is not a requirement. how you interpret what people post is your problem, not ours. im just entertained, as i am sure my buddies here are, at watching you feed into my trolling by trying to explain yourself. news flash; no one gives a sh
it, bub. this is a fun forum, and you're being a debbie downer trying to get all serious n' sh
it. what the fu
ck did you expect by posting here, supa's mom?
in my book, titled; 'f
uck yo life', using words you don't know the definition to in effort to look smart is possibly the funniest thing i see from clueless individuals across the net, with this forum being a great source of material, which i have been apart of for the past 10 years in many different forms of user.
i too, like facts. but it helps when you know them. you're using 'invoke' in place of 'evoke' or 'elicit', there is a difference. my point is to show you how you fail miserably in trying to get your point across and expect others to afford you an audience, in the mahfu
ckin' thunderdome, when you try to bout with higher intelligence consisting of a word game that is non-factual. step yo game up, bish. know how to word play and grow some thicker skin, 'cause you're not going to survive long with that outlook on life. maybe you should join s/m and ngsm's forum to see how it's done.