spidermonkey slowride
- Thread starter Papermaker85
- Live activity
- Replies 741
- Views 22K
honkyg
10+ year member
uncle ofay da kracka
whoa, whoa, whoa here,.. you're talkin' to my guy all wrong....
inhabit*
honkyg
10+ year member
uncle ofay da kracka
nope, mars is too progressive to inhibit, the next thing you know mars will be protesting for equal rights to the sun as afforded to earth.
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #336
what dont you understand dickwad the average temp is -60 degrees we are about 20 year off from having hte tech to get therer and a couple hunder to form a somewhat decent atmosphere.
no one will survive -120 degree winters. are you that ******* dense?
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #337
wtf are you blabbing about? you seem to be about as smart as slo-ride..
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #338
Mars' Atmosphere: Composition, Climate & Weather
.13% oxygen. do you even realize how much oxygen humans need to live?
atmospheric pressure is a fraction of ours.
its composed of 96% carbon dioxide, the soil is so rich plants won't grow.. not to mention once the C02 lower temperatures will drop drastically.
i mean you guys are retarded sometimes no critical think occurs..
for example carbon levels on earth are ruflly the same as the oxygen levels on mars.
earth is mostly composed of no flammable gases like nitrogen and oxygen. but they ARE burnable. you can sustain a fire. or makes it would be like a **** fire extinguisher. good luck cooking and keeping warm without natural elements to help sustain it.
.13% oxygen. do you even realize how much oxygen humans need to live?
atmospheric pressure is a fraction of ours.
its composed of 96% carbon dioxide, the soil is so rich plants won't grow.. not to mention once the C02 lower temperatures will drop drastically.
i mean you guys are retarded sometimes no critical think occurs..
for example carbon levels on earth are ruflly the same as the oxygen levels on mars.
earth is mostly composed of no flammable gases like nitrogen and oxygen. but they ARE burnable. you can sustain a fire. or makes it would be like a **** fire extinguisher. good luck cooking and keeping warm without natural elements to help sustain it.
honkyg
10+ year member
uncle ofay da kracka
1. you're a derelict when it comes to using words and punctuation properly, or you can't even proofread auto correct. either way, retarded. (define conformation and inhibit/ what is a colon?)
2. you have no concept of allegorical satire or facetiousness. once again, retarded. (might need to look up some of these words i use, but be careful, wouldnt want you to hurt yourself)
3. thick skin is a prerequisite (uh oh, another big word) if you wish to compete wits with the likes of the thread subjects.
4. trying to bring these two said subjects down to your level of stupidity will only leave them beat by your expertise in such. (but that's a win, right?)
5. scientific theory would be doomed if you were to espouse your beliefs in colonizing anything. (what is a deep space habitat? spoiler: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-selects-six-companies-to-develop-prototypes-concepts-for-deep-space-habitats)
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #340
1. If this where a publication it would be different. You are a clown of a forum therefor I don't feel i need to have structure for you to read and comprehend what i am typing! If it is a problem I will structure my writing for you. You present what i call a typical argument. the first conception is attack his Grammar and Structure. You have poor grammar or spelling yada yada..
2. What the **** does that have to do with the discussion? Now you are being condescending. Fact is you really don't have a clue and its becoming apparent.
Furthermore I know that I can be supercilious at times BUT it is to get peoples attention and invoke a certain perception. ALso might I add dealing with people who are Ad Hominems like yourself is quite frankly irritating. Now you look THAT SHiit up buddy
3. In my book Its called Life you demand respect and try to get a Point or Facts across. I'm often relentless because people choose to ignore FACTS.
4. If i don't Know something and someone has more knowledge on the subject I don't mind saying I am Wrong. In this case I never insinuated it couldn't be done.
5. that doesn't make any sense because everything i said can be PROVEN and is ALREADY KNOWN. i Didn't say it is not possible but it not LOGICAL. the earth Is the best place to live as a human. it will take a very long time to get conditions that are ideal. we are better off focusing on expanding our range in travel. FYI that artical has nothing to do whit the discussion..
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #343
don't get me wrong Id go. no doubt but its still a long ways away.. its just an opinion but Id honestly rather see use make break troughs in understanding the fundamental forces we haven't discovered yet. I'm not a physicist or renown scientist but the little I do know I know its apparent we had a great deal we don't understand.
while I agree with the special relativity its not the end all because we can isolate and use physic in the future that will be "an exception" like the time-warp theory.
I think the biggest flaw is you cannot just ben timspace at two points from a singular point.
ANYWAYS
honkyg
10+ year member
uncle ofay da kracka
i sense some butthurt, here,... gettin all up in them feelings, typos, and defensiveness.
i guess you don't know what an inference is either, with my linking to nasa. fuggin' facepalm*
you got one thing right though... calling me a clown couldn't be further from the truth as i relish in the fact that you and your ilk make it just that easy to be so. mmfwcl mofakoo!
if you didn't notice, this is the THUNDERDOME, freud, anything goes and staying on topic is not a requirement. how you interpret what people post is your problem, not ours. im just entertained, as i am sure my buddies here are, at watching you feed into my trolling by trying to explain yourself. news flash; no one gives a shit, bub. this is a fun forum, and you're being a debbie downer trying to get all serious n' shit. what the fuck did you expect by posting here, supa's mom?
in my book, titled; 'fuck yo life', using words you don't know the definition to in effort to look smart is possibly the funniest thing i see from clueless individuals across the net, with this forum being a great source of material, which i have been apart of for the past 10 years in many different forms of user.
i too, like facts. but it helps when you know them. you're using 'invoke' in place of 'evoke' or 'elicit', there is a difference. my point is to show you how you fail miserably in trying to get your point across and expect others to afford you an audience, in the mahfuckin' thunderdome, when you try to bout with higher intelligence consisting of a word game that is non-factual. step yo game up, bish. know how to word play and grow some thicker skin, 'cause you're not going to survive long with that outlook on life. maybe you should join s/m and ngsm's forum to see how it's done.
OP
Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
- Thread Starter
- #345
Retard. Im not worried about your opinion. Lol
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 741
- Views
- 21,714
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- Papermaker85
