no of course not....so are you saying it wont do that power?
I will try to post these results tomorrow. Truck off, Truck on.Test with and without the battery charger on?
They are very sweet little amps.
I think they are the next real wave to hit high output car audio now that Stetsom has all but packed up and headed home.
Im quite surprised you didn't do that in the first place.I'll take the little charger off... whew.
nG
My alternator provides between 14.4-14.6v while the truck is on, and it is a 220amp alternator... probably ~100A @ idle so how is it not logical OR valid?no of course not....
I just want the testing method to be logical and valid.
....and at this point, NG hasnt provided either.
This amplifier will do more power than it says it will do, is our way to make amplifiers. And we do a LOT of R&D to make the smallest high-power amplifiers in world.I really don't care what you do. If you were being proactive you'd of kept a "real world" circumstance for your test in the first place.
Dont get me wrong, look - if someone came up with an amp that did stupid power output in a small footprint id be all over it. (wait, didnt they try that back in 1992 with Blade Technologies?)
Not being straight would be intentionally not mentioning the charger what-so-ever...Im quite surprised you didn't do that in the first place.
Of course, this thread will be null and void in general because of such.
If you're not straight with us, then how can we believe in your results?