Some small subs coming out...

[SixthFloorFreak 10+ year member]

JD's claims are far fetched, but its plain to see his woofers work...164.1 in SS1-2, 166.7 in SS3-4, and 168.2 @ 49hz in SS5+. they did have some glue problems which meant none of those scores ended up winning, but that is a helluva first showing IMO, and i'm a big supporter of RE

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

JD's claims are far fetched, but its plain to see his woofers work...164.1 in SS1-2, 166.7 in SS3-4, and 168.2 @ 49hz in SS5+. they did have some glue problems which meant none of those scores ended up winning, but that is a helluva first showing IMO, and i'm a big supporter of RE

Indeed Brad, Indeed.

nG

 

[SixthFloorFreak 10+ year member]

Indeed Brad, Indeed.
nG

i agree with your points as well bro, but there comes a point where you have to look at actual performance, and not what the numbers say the performance should be. i will however add that the sub being discussed mainly in this thread was not used at SBN, and it is still being developed

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

i agree with your points as well bro, but there comes a point where you have to look at actual performance, and not what the numbers say the performance should be. i will however add that the sub being discussed mainly in this thread was not used at SBN, and it is still being developed

That's what I was wondering.

Like I said in the termpro thread...

"I'm all about proving people wrong...

But the keyword is PROOF, that's what I'm waiting for..."

Heh. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

nG

 

[Eldorado 5,000+ posts]

Its not what you know,its what you can prove //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif