faulkton 5,000+ posts CarAudio.com Veteran 23,267 197 neverland Jun 4, 2006 #16 i had mine in 3.5 @ 28hz and it sounded great and got plenty loud (for me at least)...i only fed it about 800 watts.. pwrbass has it now //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
i had mine in 3.5 @ 28hz and it sounded great and got plenty loud (for me at least)...i only fed it about 800 watts.. pwrbass has it now //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
denim 5,000+ posts SSAudio.com 33,766 425 SSA HQ East Jun 4, 2006 #17 funny how people complain about an SQ sub that they tune low not getting loud enough
I ighettoboyi 10+ year member Shot Caller 2,726 5 mean streets of OC Jun 4, 2006 #18 1. RL-P's are worthy of a boner 2. Just because they were intended for the utmost in sound quality, doesn't mean they can't wax the floor w/ "SPL" subs as well
1. RL-P's are worthy of a boner 2. Just because they were intended for the utmost in sound quality, doesn't mean they can't wax the floor w/ "SPL" subs as well
PWRBASS 10+ year member Member 148 0 ft. campbell ky. Jun 5, 2006 #19 funny how people complain about an SQ sub that they tune low not getting loud enough Click to expand... tune to 36 or 37 hz and it will get great numbers....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif
funny how people complain about an SQ sub that they tune low not getting loud enough Click to expand... tune to 36 or 37 hz and it will get great numbers....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif