Resonant Engineering vs. Eclipse vs. JL!!!

[creater 10+ year member]

never heard the HC10...but i have heard the 10w6 and the sw710....and its JL all the way

 

[jujumantb 10+ year member]

this is a stupid popularity contest... how many here have sufficient experience with all 3 of those?...

just wow for idiots out there.

 

[hookdupexpo 10+ year member]

Ive had experience with all 3 out there...and i didnt know that the sx has better sq than the HC had, i thought it lost some sq and gained some spl, but i could be wrong, as i am a lot...once again, HC, then jl, then eclipse. But if you just want it to sound real niec and not a lot of bass, then jl is 1st bc its the best sq sub out there IMO

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Ive had experience with all 3 out there...and i didnt know that the sx has better sq than the HC had, i thought it lost some sq and gained some spl, but i could be wrong, as i am a lot...once again, HC, then jl, then eclipse. But if you just want it to sound real niec and not a lot of bass, then jl is 1st bc its the best sq sub out there IMO

According to the guys at RE, the SX has more potential for better SQ than the HC. This does not mean it will sound better in every situation, or to every person. And, the enclosure will dictate the SQ at least as much as the driver itself will.

 

[Warbleed 10+ year member]

According to the guys at RE, the SX has more potential for better SQ than the HC. This does not mean it will sound better in every situation, or to every person. And, the enclosure will dictate the SQ at least as much as the driver itself will.

It's certainly more capable. It is an SGLC while the HC is an evenhung, and given the same displacement, that necessitates that the SGLC will have lower distortion, given the fact that SGLCs exhibit far flatter BL curves than do evenhung drivers, which have the least flat BL curve of any topology.