Qts same as Qt?`

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

well.....is it?

Click to read more...

 

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

cmon ladies!

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

Ql The system's Q at Fb, due to leakage losses; dimensionless and Qts The driver's Q at resonance (Fs), due to all losses; dimensionless. "The 'Total Q' of the driver and is derived from an equation where Qes is multiplied by Qms and the result is divided by the sum of the same."

 

[DFW40 10+ year member]

Ql The system's Q at Fb, due to leakage losses; dimensionless and Qts The driver's Q at resonance (Fs), due to all losses; dimensionless. "The 'Total Q' of the driver and is derived from an equation where Qes is multiplied by Qms and the result is divided by the sum of the same."

If that doesn't clear it up I don't know what will. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[NDMstang65 10+ year member]

Qts and Qt are one and the same...

Low Qts moofer (.18-.29) = lots of bl, high(er) Fs...generally ported box only..BIG at that

Mid Qts (.3-.49) = milder woofer, mid Fs (30ish generally speaking) and the BEST all around woofer

High Q (.5++) = no bl, poorly designed...sealed box only woofer that generally dies when ported.

 

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

wow, that last post really helped me in knowing what box to build for each when i have specs in front of me!

 

[ighettoboyi 10+ year member]

mind you that's simply a trend, the Fs isn't always higher with more Bl...

 

[NDMstang65 10+ year member]

mind you that's simply a trend, the Fs isn't always higher with more Bl...

of course not, nor are any of the other parameters...

simply a generality