PV Audio's guide to enclosure types!

This took some time!

Transmission Lines

NOTE: There are typically two types of TL enclosures: ones for us, and ones for others. The ones for us are what you typically see on here and involve output at the exit of the line. The other type is designed such that there is no output at the exit and functions simply to completely eliminate box resonance by fully damping any waves from the rear of the speaker. That models roughly as the ideal sealed enclosure and isn't intended to produce extra bass, but is perhaps the smoothest sounding enclosure you can have. The design theory is the same, although this write up concerns the first type.

Also note that I use terms like tube or pipe. That doesn't mean that a TL is supposed to by a cylinder because it doesn't have to be.

Alright, down to one of the more unique enclosure types out there. It seems like everyone here wants to know about the magical being that is the transmission line. They think that it's something so revolutionary or so technical that there's no way that they'd ever be able to build one, let alone design one themselves. Think again. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

The best way to start this discussion is to talk about a ported box. As I didn't say previously in the ported box section since it wasn't really necessary, a woofer moving on a baffle emits two waves: the front wave and the back wave. Picking whichever reference point you want, the two waves are 100% out of phase with one another. Scientifically, this means that they are 180 degrees out of phase with one another. What is phase? All that phase is is a displacement of a wave from a reference point. What does that mean? Well, lets take a look at a picture, shall we?

800px-Sine_cosine_plot.svg.png


The sine wave and the cosine wave are 90 degrees out of phase with one another. If you've forgotten or never learned, angles in units of "pi" are called radians. 2*pi radians is equal to 360 degrees, so 90 degress is equal to 1/4 of 360, so it's pi/2 radians. Why is that important? Look at 0 radians for the cosine wave, then look at pi/2 radians for the sine wave. What do you see? If you start looking at the sine wave at pi/2, then they're the same wave! Interesting, you might say, but not terribly important. Hold on there, that's the entire point behind transmission lines. Let's look at two waves, which will represent the front and back waves of your speaker:

e014b2.gif


As you can see, these two waves are 180 degrees out of phase, or pi radians out of phase. How do we know that? Assume that each intersection on the plot with the x axis is 90 degrees or pi/2 radians. Therefore, if you go to the second intersection for the red curve, you'll notice it's identical to the green curve starting at zero. Another way to look at fully out of phase waves is that they are simply the negative of one another. Simple eh? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif

Now let's look at another picture that I'll explain below:

Standing_wave_2.gif


This image is for what's called a standing wave but I'm just going to use it to illustrate my point. Look at the two waves in the background: when the black wave is zero, the two waves are 180 degrees out of phase. When the black wave is at its maximum, the two waves are 0 degrees out of phase, or completely in phase. When your speaker moves, it produces two waves: one like the red one, one like the blue one. These waves CANNOT be allowed to mix in their immediate phase shape. Ever wonder why when you play a speaker free air, all you can hear is the cone movement and not any sound? That's the two waves having completely destructive interference and canceling out because they are completely out of phase.

Back to the ported enclosure: what does it do? It attempts to take that back wave and pull it in phase with the front of the cone's wave to give you a summed output. Usually, however, the waves are not fully in phase with one another as the wave has not had sufficient time to become 180 degrees out of phase with itself. That presents a problem: you can get more output, but as frequency drops, the rolloff of the speaker is very sharp, 24db/octave in fact. For you crossover nuts, that's a 4th order slope! Why? The reasons I said above: as frequency goes down, the waves do not have sufficient time to become in phase and end up cancelling out more than adding. That's where the transmission line comes in. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/thumbsup.gif.3287b36ca96645a13a43aff531f37f02.gif

When you put a speaker in a transmission line enclosure, the wave emitted from the "port" is supposed to be exactly in phase with the front wave. The enclosures are sometimes called phase inverters for that very reason. The classical transmission line is an enclosure that has a tube length 1/2 as long as the wavelength of the driver's resonant frequency, or Fs. Why? Well, once the driver reaches Fs, which is the frequency at which the impedance of the speaker is maximum due to the electrical impedance being purely resistive and more importantly, the fact that the speaker's moving mass is precisely balanced with the restoring force of the suspension, the speaker begins to drop off in frequency response. Why? Well, Fs is the inverse relationship of suspension compliance and moving mass. That means that as the frequency gets lower, the suspension cannot provide sufficient damping to the speaker. If you can't somehow add mass to the cone or increase the suspension's compliance, the speaker's ability to reproduce those frequencies goes into the tank due to purely mechanical reasons. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

Anyway, enough on Fs, and back to the theory: the resonant frequency, as I stated, is effectively the bottom end of the speaker's frequency response. As I said before, vented boxes end up rolling off sharply due to low frequency cancellation. If you could somehow make it such that the waves are in phase once the speaker gets to its resonant frequency, you could have outstanding bass performance across the speaker's entire bandwidth! Well, there you go: by having a tube the length 1/2 of the wavelength of the resonant frequency, once that wave leaves the tube, it combines with the wave on the front and gives you a healthy boost in output, thus giving you outstanding bass at frequencies that a ported box simply cannot reproduce and with a smoothness that rivals a sealed enclosure. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif

Well, wait up a second, how long IS a wavelength (speed of sound/frequency)? Well...quite long. Let's take a Fi.Q18. If we pick the Dual 2 ohm, which has a Fs of 23.8Hz, we calculate that it has a resonant frequency wavelength of, get this: 343/23.8 of 13.6 meters, or for us Americans, 1125/23.8 or 47.27 FEET. Since we need to shift the wave 180 degrees, we halve that and get over 25 feet. Yes, that tube needs to be well over 2x the length of your car. That isn't feasible, even for a home audio environment. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/verymad.gif.3f39c5c2fd57527b671fad3efdfac756.gif

So, why do we use a quarter-wave design? Well, as we'll see in a moment, 1/4 is the best compromise between tube length and size. That means our Fi.Q would only need a tube length of about 11.8 feet, which is still long, yes, but far more manageable. But wait, if it's only 1/4 of the wave length, then that means that all we're doing is shifting the back wave by 90 degrees! Quite right, quite right. That, my friends, is where line stuffing comes in. When you build a 1/4 transmission line, you need to stuff the line with enough material such that it slows down the speed of the wave and gives it plenty of time to invert its phase completely. The amount of stuffing that you use is entirely dependent on the material and the length of the line. If your target is for a 36Hz fs, thus a line length of 94", you want to use about .5 pounds of poly fill per cubic feet. The amount of stuffing increases as line length shortens. Typically, stuffing consensus is just the opposite of a consensus, as some sources say to stuff heaviest at the woofer end and lightest at the exit, while some texts, such as the Loudspeaker Design Cookbook state to stuff heaviest at the exit and lightest near the woofer which results in a constant resistive load throughout the whole length. You can even leave about 15 to 20 percent of the end of the line completely undamped so you can play with how much you might need to get the best bass response.

The other reason to use stuffing is to reduce distortion caused by high frequency sounds. As sound passes through the fibrous medium that is your stuffing, two things happen: first, when the frequency is low, the fibers and the sound waves couple together to slightly attenuate the magnitude of the output, but more importantly, to slow down the speed of sound which is what we're after. Second, when the frequency is higher, the wave and the fibers do not couple at all, and instead the sound is merely attenuated from the output. This is the reasoning why TLs tend to have exceptionally smooth bass characteristics because the line damping knocks out high frequency harmonics that have no business being passed through the line. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Continued BELOW

 
Continued from ABOVE

The final considerations are the pipe diameter and where to put the woofer. In this case, you want the cross sectional area of the tube to be the radiating area, or Sd of your speaker. Why? Well, all that we're doing is taking whatever is coming off of the back wave, shifting its phase, and combining it with the front wave out front. You don't want anything bigger or smaller, as all you're trying to do is simulate having the backwave be another speaker that is in phase with what you already have. You can, if you want, taper from beginning to end starting with 1.5-2x Sd at the start and ending with Sd at the exit. You can also load the speaker with a slight chamber before it enters the tube, but that's up to you. What that does is creates an effective 1st order filter that again knocks down upper harmonic sounds as well. It's suggested by George Augspurger, a phenom in the field of TL design when he worked for JBL, that the volume of the chamber should only be about 1/3 of the total line volume. Most of these changes are either rules of thumbs or are subjective to the listener. To keep it simple, keep it uniform. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

For the location of the speaker in the tube, you've got a couple of choices. You can usually offset the speaker about 1/5 to 1/3 from the beginning of the tube if you want. The further away you move the speaker from the opening, however, the higher the rolloff frequency of the system. At 1/5 offset, that means you lose 20% of your bandwidth. While that might be desirable in some cases where the speaker has notorious breakup modes or simply poorly damped low frequency behavior, it usually isn't and you should put the cone at the beginning of the tube. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Well, that's about it! There's a fair bit more to TL theory than this, such as how to fold the tube, flaring it, tapering it, variations of the two, damping materials, stuffing density, and loads of other stuff that you really don't need to know to start designing your own TL. I hope this cleared TLs up! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

-Dave

 
Good write-up. Unfortunately, and this of course is not your fault, I knew all of this. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

I might throw a SI BM in a TL. What do you suggest in terms of parameters for TL? As in, what would you recommend in terms of a good Fs / Sd for a driver. Or just give me links.

BTW, here are T/S for the SI BM:

12 inch

Re (coils in series) 7.8

Fs 28.3

Le 3.4

Qms 3.55

Qes 0.38

Qts 0.34

Cms 158

Mms (grams) 128

Vas (liters) 83.6

Sd (cm^2) 480

BL 21.9

SPL (1W/1M) 88

EDIT:: Also, where did you derive 1125 from?

 
Good write-up. Unfortunately, and this of course is not your fault, I knew all of this. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
I might throw a SI BM in a TL. What do you suggest in terms of parameters for TL? As in, what would you recommend in terms of a good Fs / Sd for a driver. Or just give me links.
That wasn't for people who already know this, silly. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
What I would do is to use a TL alignment table or spreadsheet. Look at the bottom here:

http://www.quarter-wave.com/TLs/TL_Theory.html

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Oh, and 1125 is the speed of sound in feet/sec. The 343 number is the speed of sound in meters/sec.

 
That wasn't for people who already know this, silly. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
What I would do is to use a TL alignment table or spreadsheet. Look at the bottom here:

http://www.quarter-wave.com/TLs/TL_Theory.html

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Oh, and 1125 is the speed of sound in feet/sec. The 343 number is the speed of sound in meters/sec.
Okay. Thank you. And I confused the speed of sound with the speed of light. D'oh. FAILSAUCE. I was like, "Certainly the speed of sound is more than 1125 feet / second!"

 
I'll have the horn write up done probably today. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Horns and IB are still coming, school > audio unfortunately //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 
so i know this is an old thread but ive recently come across a paper that i deals with whats properly called "alpha transmisson line enclosure" i think its being slanged as half wave, or inaccurately a TL encosure, from my very limited knowledge on these i tink that a transmission line enlcosure and the Alpha transmission line enclosure while they share certain aspects, or factors they iirc are vastly different. as a transmission line enclosire when opened looks like a crazy maze that the air is directed thus increasing the air volume so to say of the enclosure and from what i hear are a PITA to create.

an alpha transmission ine enclosure, or i believe nick naedm the half wave like afore mentioned in a reply is simple and really effective, its essentioally something like the ol SAS BAZZOOKA bass CANNON. with an opening, off the side but baffled in a sensej think of a mid driver tower speaker enclosure for home audio system and the driver is mounted on one of the vertical sides of the tower, the opening would be on the horizontal with either or mYBE BOTHE THEopening having a bafle of sometype (just not freely open, and or only a certain amount of batting like poly fill and thas it its a reletively seemingly simplistic calcualtion to determine size of it, and anyways

ive got a pdf on the alpha trans line enclosure i read.
also this alpha line transmission enclosure, was used in the
 

Attachments

  • Alpha-Transmission-Lines.pdf
    950.3 KB · Views: 18
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

Ill check it out. I was actually on the site last week. Thanks!
3
231
if you can read a simplistic book you can follow the directions to put together just fine. Its not rocket science. If you have questions about the...
3
268
Well, I've owned probably over 100 different drivers in the last 40 years and almost every single speaker in the NVX line-up over the last 8...
16
688

About this thread

PV Audio

5,000+ posts
The Vision of Sound
Thread starter
PV Audio
Joined
Location
Indy
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
41
Views
19,664
Last reply date
Last reply from
nightowl09
1714321195129.png

Doxquzme

    Apr 28, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
1714321134050.png

Doxquzme

    Apr 28, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top