?Precision Power 4 channels?

I heard it mentioned that BK series design started from Soundstream rubicon board. Both seem like nice products. I'd take PPI Sedona over MB Quart offerings any day. Sedona's 23-inch length does seem a bit excessive for me though.

 
Someone mentioned the PPI phantom 900.4 to me but after researching it, i found its a class D. That wouldnt really work for a couple sets of components would it....?
It damm well better... cuz I'm gonna run my front stage with it. Class D has come a long way.

 
quackhead- can you explain to me the difference in a class D and class A/B, ive always been under the impression that class D is mainly for pushing subwoofers, can you tell me whats different about the PPI 900.4? Im running 2 sets of Image dynamics xs57 components.

 
quackhead- can you explain to me the difference in a class D and class A/B, ive always been under the impression that class D is mainly for pushing subwoofers, can you tell me whats different about the PPI 900.4? Im running 2 sets of Image dynamics xs57 components.
Good comps..hmm..that is a very lengthy conversation, picture A/B as a linear analog amplifier and a class D as a switching Pulse Width Modulating amplifier. The class d converts the input signal into a square wave. The square wave is ran through output transistors (MOSFETS) that are switched either fully on or fully off at a very high frequency (250,000-400,000hz) and then through a low pass filter, right before the outputs. The LPF rounds out the square wave as it filters everything above the amplifiers usable frequency, in the PPI's case, 20,000hz. The primary difference is dramatically increased efficiency on behalf of the class D. The improved switch designs and filtering designs on the Class D's in the last few years is what has allowed them to be used in full range audio applications. PPI, Infinity, Alpine, Kicker, JL, IA,etc.(and many Pro Audio amp companies like Crown, Peavey, Carvin, etc.) all have full range class D amps out these days....but the PPI is underrated and very clean for it's price point. Is it my first choice for the best 4ch amp available? Hell no...but for the $/size/output, it is very hard to beat.

 
great info quack!!

On that note is there any other 4 channel amps out there with atleast 120rms per channel at 4 ohms that you would reccommend me looking into? thanks in advance

 
great info quack!!
On that note is there any other 4 channel amps out there with atleast 120rms per channel at 4 ohms that you would reccommend me looking into? thanks in advance
Good amp for the $.

AQ 120.4

IMO, Very good SQ amp for the $

Multi-Channel Amplifiers Eleets 4ch

Zuki Audio Eleets 4-Channel Amp Review

Better SQ amp for the $:

WoofersEtc.com - Draconia III - ZED Audio 4-Channel Amplifier

money no object SQ amp for the $

WoofersEtc.com - C2K-4.0X - Zapco Competition 4 Ch 600 Watt Amplifier

 
ouch, i didnt relize they were that long, that definetly puts the sedona series out of the pic for me.

If you're concerned with the size, consider PPI Phantom P900.4. It's a compact D-class amplifier. D-class amps are more efficient, so they run cooler, use less current, smaller heat-sinks, etc. I honestly have no idea how much difference there is in sound between class D and A/B. In my car, I currently use an A/B for my front stage, and this PPI bridged for subwoofer and rears (which I don't use right now). Maybe when I get bored, I will move my front woofers from the A/B amplifier to this PPI to do a comparison. I doubt there will be a lot difference, specially after running my head unit's auto-tune function.

 
Good comps..hmm..that is a very lengthy conversation, picture A/B as a linear analog amplifier and a class D as a switching Pulse Width Modulating amplifier. The class d converts the input signal into a square wave. The square wave is ran through output transistors (MOSFETS) that are switched either fully on or fully off at a very high frequency (250,000-400,000hz) and then through a low pass filter, right before the outputs. The LPF rounds out the square wave as it filters everything above the amplifiers usable frequency, in the PPI's case, 20,000hz. The primary difference is dramatically increased efficiency on behalf of the class D. The improved switch designs and filtering designs on the Class D's in the last few years is what has allowed them to be used in full range audio applications. PPI, Infinity, Alpine, Kicker, JL, IA,etc.(and many Pro Audio amp companies like Crown, Peavey, Carvin, etc.) all have full range class D amps out these days....but the PPI is underrated and very clean for it's price point. Is it my first choice for the best 4ch amp available? Hell no...but for the $/size/output, it is very hard to beat.
I couldn't have done a better explanation... and I'm an EE.

I've been leery of Class D for years because of the reputation for low damping factor and distortion at high frequencies, but that rep is waay outdated with the current generation of amps. Technology marches on.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Firebird 1991

10+ year member
Stroked
Thread starter
Firebird 1991
Joined
Location
Eastern Iowa
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
21
Views
4,470
Last reply date
Last reply from
trumpet
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top