Power acoustiks vs. Hifonics

[solidcrowd 10+ year member]

also what about crunch i never heard of them?? ne1 hear nething good or bad

Click to read more...

 

[oxsign 5,000+ posts]

no to crunch. PA is alright, hifonics is good

Depends on who you ask. I had a ground pounder (crunch) and it was ok. I have had nothing but bad luck with hifonics amps. Power acoustiks have been great for me. I had the 2400, now i'm on a 3000. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif

 

[solidcrowd 10+ year member]

ne1 else its 50 50 right now

 

[melnlovr911 10+ year member]

i have 2 pa 3000db's, they put out decent power (below rated) and its a little dirty (distortion)

 

[LIGHTBEING 10+ year member]

I would get PA.

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

I did not vote because I dont like the choices

 

[Mike yayo 10+ year member]

hifonics i think are a more reputable name than power acoustik ew.

 

[melnlovr911 10+ year member]

hifonics = better quality $$

PA = cheaper product $

 

[psych0ticnemes1 5,000+ posts]

i would go with power acoustik... i've never heard of a blown class d amp of theirs, but i hear of 1500bd's blowing like the wind