and.....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gifpothead
you know....it took two cars to make this accident happen.Yes. He deserves it because of the end result, not because he was high or had any in his system. He deserves it because he killed 3 people and a baby, accident or not the end result is the same and it wouldn't have happened at all if he wasn't speeding and blown through a stop sign at 66 mph. So yeah, at best he deserves life in prison. The parents of the dead should give his his due punishment instead.
This is an example of another poor kid whos life will absolutley be ruined because of our unjust criminalization of cannabis. If you smoke you know that your not ****ing high at all for 2 ****ing weeks. We need to reform laws for this type of situation. Im not taking away from the fact that he killed people. All in all it was an ACCIDENT and that should be dealt with but not for intoxication reasons.
This hits home, last week I got in a car accident while working, Im a courier, and I failed my test for THC. It was a little fender bender. I have NEVER smoked before work or anything like that but everything in my life got turned upside down, just because I had metabolites in my ****ing system.
And what a ****ing terrible title. "Pothead driver..." Pothead you arogant ****? He smoked once....
Based on the guy's testimony. And therin lies my issue. Is there a scientific test to determine, whether the guy smoke last week, 2 weeks ago, or 2 hours ago?The question is one of association. If his use of marijuana did not directly cause the accident (ie. it had been two weeks since he had used it), then the label "pothead" is of no merit in the title.
To others who wish to be activists on marijuana: I appreciate your support. However, you have to a) Not take the bait, b) Argue intelligently. If you fail to do either of those, you only end up hurting the cause.