kbjt 10+ year member
it's all about the BASS!!
well i need to know what box will be louder a ported or seald //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
I've never heard a sealed box get lower than a ported one, all things being equal.Originally posted by brad.farmer A ported box is almost always louder than a sealed box. But a sealed box is able to get lower notes than a ported box, and tends to be cleaner, while loosing SPL, which looses the amount of amplitude.
brad.farmer
http://www.eatel.net/~amptech/elecdisc/spboxnew2.htmA sealed enclosure will be the smallest (for a given response shape) and will have good low frequency extension but may not have the best low frequency extension. If space is limited, this may be your best choice.
A ported enclosure will generally have a better low frequency extension for a given response shape (alignment) but would require a larger enclosure. If you made the enclosure as small as the sealed enclosure but ported it to gain the low frequency response, the output would deviate from the desired flat response.
Sub was an 10" HE2. Sealed box it was loud, but in the ported one it got so deep you could feel it in your chest. It hit the lower notes alot better. Same amp, same car, same song.Originally posted by brad.farmer THIS IS CONVERSATION. NOT DUE TO ORIGINAL TOPIC.
Which subs were you listening to, sir. Because it might have just been the sub.
brad.farmer
You ignored this:Originally posted by brad.farmer That's a Rockford, right? Yeah, you probably couldn't tell the difference. Don't get me wrong, they sound pretty good. But, they're made for serious SPL. Therefore, you might not have been able to tell. They may get low, but mostly they are made for SPL.
brad.farmer
A sealed enclosure will be the smallest (for a given response shape) and will have good low frequency extension but may not have the best low frequency extension. If space is limited, this may be your best choice.
A ported enclosure will generally have a better low frequency extension for a given response shape (alignment) but would require a larger enclosure. If you made the enclosure as small as the sealed enclosure but ported it to gain the low frequency response, the output would deviate from the desired flat response.
ignorance is bliss.. but in brad's case it's just annoying.Originally posted by brad.farmer That's a Rockford, right? Yeah, you probably couldn't tell the difference. Don't get me wrong, they sound pretty good. But, they're made for serious SPL. Therefore, you might not have been able to tell. They may get low, but mostly they are made for SPL.
brad.farmer
OK, just totally ignore what i said and tell me what i heard. It's not like i listened to both systems and knew there is a difference or anything. *******. Get your **** straight and stop trying to correct people when you are obviously wrong. I heard both enclosures in the EXACT same setup and could very easily tell a difference. If you couldn't you must be deaf.Originally posted by brad.farmer That's a Rockford, right? Yeah, you probably couldn't tell the difference. Don't get me wrong, they sound pretty good. But, they're made for serious SPL. Therefore, you might not have been able to tell. They may get low, but mostly they are made for SPL.
brad.farmer