Polk MMC6500

[redbeard 10+ year member]

Which would be the better amp to run these? RF P400-2 @ 100 X 2 , or the RF P450.4 @ 225 x 2 ?

Click to read more...

 

[Slammed 5,000+ posts]

P450.2

be careful with the gains...headroom is good though

rated at 125 Watts RMS each right?

I hear those Polks can handle power well

 

[DejaWiz 5,000+ posts]

If you can find one cheap, the C400.4 since it has an active xo tailored to the MMC6500's built in.

 

[redbeard 10+ year member]

yea slammed, 125 each. thanks for the help. dejawiz thanks for the link.

 

[SRim23 5,000+ posts]

my jbl 300x4 gives them 123 to each side and they take it very well. tweet can be a tad harsh if set too high but once you find a nice balance between the mid and the tweet they are a nice set.

i did have them on an alpine that was only giving them about 90 rms and they lacked a little bit. they were also in some q logic kick panels at the time so that could of been a factor but i think the closest you can get to 125 youd be better off.

 

[redbeard 10+ year member]

yea im going to hook them up tomorrow and see what i got. thanks srim23.

 

[MBrock4u 10+ year member]

P 400-2. If you do use the other amp you will really have tto watch the gaiins. I am pshing 90 rms for my Polk momo's and they sound great with no problems.