mpowered325is
10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
You must think Aztecs are good looking cars if you actually think the F40 is an ugly car!Thank god. Those things a ****** ugly.
You must think Aztecs are good looking cars if you actually think the F40 is an ugly car!Thank god. Those things a ****** ugly.
I cant imagine a better one then what the F40 has, 3.0l V8 with 2 snails. I could listen to that forever!I can't like any car that doesn't have a radio. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
You obviously missed my point. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gifI cant imagine a better one then what the F40 has, 3.0l V8 with 2 snails. I could listen to that forever!
Please tell me what Ferrari's are better looking then the F40.......Its a go cart with 500+hp. It might be the ONLY raw supercar ever built. No electronics, no stability and traction controll, active dampening shocks etc etc. Its a TRUE supercar.I wouldn't say F40's are ugly, but they sure aren't one of Ferrari's best looking vehicles. But that's beside the point, the F40 is one of the closest street cars to an actual race car that you can buy. That ugly ass wing on the back? Unlike your neighbor's Civic, the F40's ugly wing is functional. The massive side scoops? Functional. The aerodynamics? Functional.
In a world where most cars are all show and no go, the F40 is all go, and still some show. You have to respect that, even if I would chose a dozen other cars before it.
Lots of them are better looking. The F430, pretty much anything that the Scuderia division touches, California, and even the 599.Please tell me what Ferrari's are better looking then the F40.......Its a go cart with 500+hp. It might be the ONLY raw supercar ever built. No electronics, no stability and traction controll, active dampening shocks etc etc. Its a TRUE supercar.
I assumed there was no need for me to put a notation on the original post explaining that what I think looks better is nothing but my opinion. Aesthetics are subjective. Ironically, the lines on an F40 are objective. Those lines are what they are predominantly for wind resistance, down force, and cold-air induction. F40's were designed with performance first, aesthetics second. It would be like saying a drag racing funny car has ugly lines. Those lines are functional, not to be pleasing to the eye. So tbh, I find a disagreement on if the car looks pretty or not to be silly.Please tell me what Ferrari's are better looking then the F40.......Its a go cart with 500+hp. It might be the ONLY raw supercar ever built. No electronics, no stability and traction controll, active dampening shocks etc etc. Its a TRUE supercar.
Lots of them are better looking. The F430, pretty much anything that the Scuderia division touches, California, and even the 599.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The top red one is the same as the silver one. Only difference is Scuderia got ahold of the Silver one. They are both base F430's though.would own the grey one and black one