They have a bit of a "bulky, industrial" look to them, but hell, I kinda like it so I wouldn't be embarrassed showing them off. I've seen a lot worse. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
So your treo ssi 10 has 3.5 inches peak to peak excurion:crazy://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif Highly unlikly. its 27 peak to peak. Which means the rsdc has better excursion than that, along with several other subs like the fiq, ssd, btl, ect.. With that said xmax is not the most important factor, but the pg is not lacking in that department. This just came to my attention, as I thought it was 14.8 peak to peak for the rsdc. So the rsd is 29.6mm... Back to the subjectthe sub i have right now is 24mm one way.
EDIT: actually mine's 27mm.
last i checked there is 2.54 centimeters in an inch so that would be 25.4 mm in an inch. so my sub has 27mm xmax which is just a hair over an inch. my calculations are coming out to be 2.12598...... peak to peak.So your treo ssi 10 has 3.5 inches peak to peak excurion:crazy://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif Highly unlikly. its 27 peak to peak. Which means the rsdc has better excursion than that, along with several other subs like the fiq, ssd, btl, ect.. With that said xmax is not the most important factor, but the pg is not lacking in that department. This just came to my attention, as I thought it was 14.8 peak to peak for the rsdc. So the rsd is 29.6mm... Back to the subject![]()
well i know for sure my sub can move over 27mm peak to peak. i am going to assume it's 27 one way. i have played really low frequencies really loud before and have seen what would appear to be about 2" of movement. i know for a fact it's more than an inch peak to peak.Some companies can misleadingly advertise their peek to peek excursion as just Xmax.