I'll go as far as to say that ... it's truly pathetic.
Can you imagine a Chevelle with a Cavalier 2.2L? Somehow it clicks in my mind that it's something they'd do.
I always thought the demand was "muscle, horsepower, torque, more muscle" ... not "economical, practical, 'prissy' ". If you want a grocery getter, don't run to GM saying you want them to make a 4 door camaro with a 3.1L ... they invented the Cavalier, Malibu, and Impala for that.
Oh ... I forgot ... you know that new "2003 Chevy SS" ... "the family sedan with muscle" ... how does family sedan and muscle end up in the same sentence? 430hp small block ... ok, thats nice ... "paired with a Hydra-Matic 4-L65E, four-speed, electronically controlled, automatic transmission..." Automatic ... muscle ... am I missing something? It's rear wheel drive, so thats a plus.
- Steve