These subs look perfectly fine to me one 2 SAZ 3500's wayyyyyyyyyyy over rated power by a lil dont ya think? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif
how does he have them ran? might be at 4 ohm each amp... so that wouldn't be 3500 each then?so that changes what? the fact that he has 7000 watts on subs that are rated 600 each
I did notice he never showed the subs other than the Surround... so eh
---------- Post added at 11:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:35 PM ----------
how does he have them ran? might be at 4 ohm each amp... so that wouldn't be 3500 each then?
the fact of the matter is thos subs arnt seeing 7k.so that changes what? the fact that he has 7000 watts on subs that are rated 600 each
Tell him to show the subs/amps with no cut aways... wired at 1 ohm... and play them full tilt for 1 full songlol whoopty dooo so what he has diff videos one with one saz 3500 then this one with too cuz all the braniacs on caco that have the most to say!
Those subs can handle maybe 1k each. There is just no way in hell they are being ran even at 2 ohms.the fact of the matter is even by some stupid fucken chance they were at 4 ohms which there not..2 on each 3500 is still good being as to see how there 600 watts right?
your serious? lol the things people come up with..Tell him to show the subs/amps with no cut aways... wired at 1 ohm... and play them full tilt for 1 full song
Then... I'll throw the same amount of power on my RE HC for 30mins non stop lets see who's dies first...
im betting each sub is only seeing about 800-900rms which is pretty decent for a 600rms rated sub. but still that guy is an idiot.the fact of the matter is even by some stupid fucken chance they were at 4 ohms which there not..2 on each 3500 is still good being as to see how there 600 watts right?