theCybe
5,000+ posts
sector three
Two scenarios, progressively less original //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
By the way:
2) In a box with multiple subs, multiple chambers; Is it rediculous to have each chamber tuned an increment higher than the next?
My thought process suggests this would help fill out whichever area lacks;
In other words, the range lost in a 20Hz tune would be covered by a seperate chamber tuned at 30, 40, etc.
I'm aware of the bottoming out concept, whereas there is insufficient resistance in a, say, 60hz tune for a 30Hz note; Aside from that, seem reasonable? Are there some cancellation issues I've missed?
3) Passive radiators; ? A cone assembly without a driver; Understood; but the application / benefits / math involved to use that?
4) Membrane; A clothed port; What does this entail / achieve?
Can't wait to see these replies =)
By the way:
1) Is there an advantage to using multiple ports in a single chamber to achieve a desired 'tune'? Is this somehow mathmatically preposterous?The following words are either very common, too long, or too short and were not included in your search: different ports
2) In a box with multiple subs, multiple chambers; Is it rediculous to have each chamber tuned an increment higher than the next?
My thought process suggests this would help fill out whichever area lacks;
In other words, the range lost in a 20Hz tune would be covered by a seperate chamber tuned at 30, 40, etc.
I'm aware of the bottoming out concept, whereas there is insufficient resistance in a, say, 60hz tune for a 30Hz note; Aside from that, seem reasonable? Are there some cancellation issues I've missed?
3) Passive radiators; ? A cone assembly without a driver; Understood; but the application / benefits / math involved to use that?
4) Membrane; A clothed port; What does this entail / achieve?
Can't wait to see these replies =)