magnet question

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

in a typical speaker, the magnet would be described as being magnetized through it's thickness, correct?

Click to read more...

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

ne1?

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

wat?

I don't really understand the question you are trying to ask.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

wat?
I don't really understand the question you are trying to ask.

thought it was just me

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

If you had a magnet laying flat on a table that was 8"od, 3"id and 1" thick and the magnetization ran parallel to the table would you describe tha as being magnetized through its thickness?

 

[ahole-ic]

If you're asking what gives the magnet strength the number of lines of flux determine it's magnetic potential, but not strength. The REAL motor strength comes into play with the top plate. It needs to be designed in such a way as to transfer the lines of flux to the magnetic gap. (magnet strength then doesn't count without the voice coil taken into account. The closer you can get the coil to the top plate the stronger the force is, but linearity becomes crucial.) Not that this matters but notice that you're only using one pole of the magnet. The other pole is wasted.

the shape of the magnet can concentrate the lines of flux to the top plate. Length is not the sole determining factor.

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

If you're asking what gives the magnet strength the number of lines of flux determine it's magnetic potential, but not strength. The REAL motor strength comes into play with the top plate. It needs to be designed in such a way as to transfer the lines of flux to the magnetic gap. (magnet strength then doesn't count without the voice coil taken into account. The closer you can get the coil to the top plate the stronger the force is, but linearity becomes crucial.) Not that this matters but notice that you're only using one pole of the magnet. The other pole is wasted.
the shape of the magnet can concentrate the lines of flux to the top plate. Length is not the sole determining factor.

the red part is the only thing that pertains to what I am asking. I'm not intrested in strength, rather the terminology when ordering my segmnted magnets.

Thanks for trying

 

[Oneswtredhead 10+ year member]

well maybe if you asked the question a lil better you woulda gotten a better response.

google would work better for you i think.

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

Well I guess that is pretty freaking evident.

 

[ahole-ic]

Well I guess that is pretty freaking evident.

If you were competent enough to ask the question you would have got an appropriate answer. I had to guess what you were asking and gave you a response. It wasn't what you were wanting but who could have known? You aren't smart enough to articulate what you want. There is nothing worse than ignorant people being arrogant. You clearly have no reason to think you are better than anyone so what makes you think you can be arrogant? You fail.

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

If you were competent enough to ask the question you would have got an appropriate answer. I had to guess what you were asking and gave you a response. It wasn't what you were wanting but who could have known? You aren't smart enough to articulate what you want. There is nothing worse than ignorant people being arrogant. You clearly have no reason to think you are better than anyone so what makes you think you can be arrogant? You fail.

I was speaking about my inability to use the correct terminology to get my point across. Nothing to do with you. So put your guns away big guy.

My origional post said "in a typical speaker, the magnet would be described as being magnetized through it's thickness, correct? " 90% of your response was about the strength of the magnet and the top and bottom plates. So if you want to start with the ignorant insults lets go there. Do you have any idea what I am asking?

 

[ahole-ic]

I was speaking about my inability to use the correct terminology to get my point across. Nothing to do with you. So put your guns away big guy.
My origional post said "in a typical speaker, the magnet would be described as being magnetized through it's thickness, correct? " 90% of your response was about the strength of the magnet and the top and bottom plates. So if you want to start with the ignorant insults lets go there. Do you have any idea what I am asking?

"magnetized through its thickness" doesn't make any sort of sense. Not only do I not know what the hell you're getting at with that, but neither does anyone else.... thus my last post.

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

"magnetized through its thickness" doesn't make any sort of sense. Not only do I not know what the hell you're getting at with that, but neither does anyone else.... thus my last post.

It is a term used when discribing magnets with in the industry. Such as in this link http://www.magnet4less.com/images/magnetization_800.jpg

So just back the fvck off

 

[ahole-ic]

It is a term used when discribing magnets with in the industry. Such as in this link http://www.magnet4less.com/images/magnetization_800.jpg
So just back the fvck off

I had never seen that chart but all you have to do is look at the pictures and look at a speaker motor to know the answer douchebag.

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

I had never seen that chart but all you have to do is look at the pictures and look at a speaker motor to know the answer douchebag.

that is one chart, the reason I ask is it has been discibed differently on other sites. I was trying to get someone with knowledge to confirm my understanding. That person obviously isn't you