kicker zx400.1 or Xplod 1000w?

[somekook 10+ year member]

the xplod has a 60 amp fuse rating, the kicker only a 40 amp. i want more power, i dont care about quality. goin in my "new" caddy //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Click to read more...

 

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

They dont compare

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

which one then?

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

for the most power?

 

[Rashaddd 5,000+ posts]

xplods are way underrated so I hope you're ready for the 10k+ you'll probably get out of it

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

LOL 10k + !

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

its got a 60 amp fuse so it aint goin over 840 watts with 14 volts in! and thats at 100 percent efficiency!

 

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

No comment

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

why no comment

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

some real help, anyone?

 

[endofdays89 5,000+ posts]

that sony xplod is known to make subs break the sound barrier, putting out over 12,000 watts of true power. If you want the bang for the buck and one of the hottest amps on the shelves, you must get the xplod.

 

[bonesninja 5,000+ posts]

ok i'll be different here....i would get the Kicker. It will put out more than rated power and is probably cleaner power than the Sony. Just my $.02

 

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

what are you paying for either? I bet there is a more affordable option that will do the job better.

 

[somekook 10+ year member]

i got the kicker zx400.1 it was only 90 dollars including shipping. Endofdays89 -- go straight to hell. revrider1, thanks for nothing.

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

should have got teh xplods!!!