Etronics.com. Never heard of them but they had the best price.where did you get them?
The test that I linked to used 1.8. But the specs on it for a sealed enclosure are 0.78-1.20 cu. ft.You can run them in 1cu but to get the best sq and the best lowend 1.8 is what I have read. I think in 1cu you will get some good SPL out of them.
Well I can't use that much. The most I will be able to do is around 1.1 or 1.2. One of the reasons I went with these was because they were spec'd for a smaller box than my current Bostons (1.5 cu ft.).FYI. Errin that works for Phoenix Gold said to use 1.8 cu ft.
MJ
135db = weakFrom what I have read 1.8cu ft per sub with 600wrms will get you 135db that sounds real good. MJ
Cool. That's what I was hoping.Hey I am not saying it will not work. I dont think you will have a problem at all with that size box. It should hit pretty hard.
You read it right but I am not sure it is right. I have read so many different ratings for these subs, including Phoenix Golds site, that I don't know what they are actually rated at. I had Boston Rally RS12 rated at 400 peak and gave them 300 RMS for ten years. Never had an issue. So I don't think I will have a problem giving these RSD112D's 450 WRMS. Right.SpecsRMS Power: 50W
Peak Power: 500W
did I read that right?
135 dB.135db = weak
WTF is that? English please!135 dB.
Sealed.
SQ Alignment.
600 watts.
$80 woofer.
Weak?
What were you expecting? The 14X capable of >$100 IA 187 subs in that situation? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif